Author(s):  
Chantal Simon ◽  
Hazel Everitt ◽  
Françoise van Dorp ◽  
Nazia Hussain ◽  
Emma Nash ◽  
...  

This chapter in the Oxford Handbook of General Practice explores haematology in general practice. It covers full blood count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. It explores diagnosis and initial investigation of anaemia, iron deficiency anaemia, haemoglobinopathies, bleeding and clotting disorders, and anticoagulation. It examines haematological malignancy, acute leukaemia, chronic leukaemia and myeloproliferation, lymphoma, immune deficiency, and allergy.


Author(s):  
Chantal Simon ◽  
Hazel Everitt ◽  
Françoise van Dorp ◽  
Matt Burkes

Full blood count and ESR Anaemia: diagnosis and initial investigation Iron deficiency anaemia Other anaemias Haemoglobinopathy Bleeding and clotting disorders Anticoagulation Haematological malignancy Acute leukaemia Chronic leukaemia and myeloproliferation Lymphoma Immune deficiency syndromes Allergies The most commonly requested blood test is the full blood count (FBC). It gives information on:...


ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000611
Author(s):  
Barbara Kiesewetter ◽  
Nathan I Cherny ◽  
Nicolas Boissel ◽  
Francesco Cerisoli ◽  
Urania Dafni ◽  
...  

ObjectiveValue frameworks in oncology have not been validated for the assessment of treatments in haematological malignancies, but to avoid overlaps and duplications it appears reasonable to build up experience on existing value frameworks, such as the European Society for Medical Oncology—Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).MethodsHere we present the results of the first feasibility testing of the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 for haematological malignancies based on the grading of 80 contemporary studies for acute leukaemia, chronic leukaemia, lymphoma, myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes. The aims were (1) to evaluate the scorability of data, (2) to evaluate the reasonableness of the generated grades for clinical benefit using the current version and (3) to identify shortcomings in the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 that require amendments to improve the efficacy and validity of the scale in grading new treatments in the management of haematological malignancies.ResultsIn general, the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 was found to be widely applicable to studies in haematological malignancies, generating scores that were judged as reasonable by European Hematology Association (EHA) experts. A small number of studies could either not be graded or were not appropriately graded. The reasons, related to the differences between haematological and solid tumour malignancies, are identified and described.ConclusionsBased on the findings of this study, ESMO and EHA are committed to develop a version of the ESMO-MCBS that is validated for haematological malignancies. This development process will incorporate all of the usual stringencies for accountability of reasonableness that have characterised the development of the ESMO-MCBS including field testing, statistical modelling, evaluation for reasonableness and openness to appeal and revision. Applying such a scale will support future public policy decision-making regarding the value of new treatments for haematological malignancies and will provide insights that could be helpful in the design of future clinical trials.


Author(s):  
N A A Khairudin ◽  
F N M Ariff ◽  
A S A Nasir ◽  
W A Mustafa ◽  
Wan Khairunizam ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørgen Ellegaard ◽  
Carl Erik Mogensen ◽  
Knud Kragballe
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-194
Author(s):  
C. C. Okany ◽  
O. O. Akinyanju

The Lancet ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 337 (8732) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.P. Davis ◽  
Helga Brown

2002 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 842-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviana Roman ◽  
Christian Billard ◽  
Catherine Kern ◽  
Hélène Ferry-Dumazet ◽  
Jean-Claude Izard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document