Analysis of 985 fire incidents related to oil- and gas production on the Norwegian continental shelf

Author(s):  
C. Sesseng ◽  
K. Storesund ◽  
A. Steen-Hansen
2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 809
Author(s):  
I.V. Stejskal

Australia’s offshore petroleum industry is beginning to mature and many of its offshore oil and gas production facilities are reaching the end of their operational life. These facilities consist of an array of infrastructure including wells, wellheads, platforms and monopods of various construction, pipeline and flowlines, and anchors and risers. Many of these facilities will need to be decommissioned at the end of their operational and economic life in a safe and environmentally responsible manner.The Australian government has the jurisdiction to direct a company to remove all facilities associated with offshore production projects located on Australia’s continental shelf, but there is room for discretion for other decommissioning options. The manner in which facilities are decommissioned must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account factors such as technical feasibility, commercial risk, safety and social impacts, costs and environmental effects.Two decommissioning options appropriate in some instances are to leave selected facilities in-situ or dispose of a facility to some other location on the continental shelf, preferably in deep water. Residual liability refers to the responsibility and liability associated with leaving facilities on the seabed. If a facility is allowed to remain on the seabed, questions related to residual liability arise:who is responsible for any facility left on the seabed; andwho is liable to pay for compensation in the event that this facility is allowed to remain in place on the seabed and injury or damage is caused to a third person or property?There is no universally accepted practice in relation to residual liability in relation to decommissioning. In some countries, the State assumes responsibility; in other countries the company remains responsible in perpetuity. This issue still needs to be clarified in Australia.


1974 ◽  
Vol 188 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. Allcock

Development of offshore oil and gas production from the continental shelf and in even deeper water will be dependent on engineers. It is of primary importance to understand the nature of the oil and gas production industry in order to follow more clearly the contribution that will be required from many of the professional branches of engineering, and a great deal of new technology must be developed in order that the problems of the future may be overcome. The difficulty may not be in defining the future engineering of oil and gas development but in finding engineers in sufficient numbers to meet the demand.


Author(s):  
D.A. Mirzoev ◽  

According to forecast estimates, the depletion of continental oil and gas fields of the Russian Federation is 30 - 50%, and the fields of the continental shelf are less than 1%. Therefore, the main volumes of growth of reserves, oil and gas production in the fuel and energy complex system should be planned at the expense of resources and reserves of the continental shelf. The article considers the principal features of development of oil and gas fields of the continental shelf and criteria determining types of offshore oil and gas fisheries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document