The role of adenosine receptors in the central action of caffeine

Author(s):  
John Daly ◽  
Dan Shi
Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 280-LB ◽  
Author(s):  
SHANU JAIN ◽  
DILIP K. TOSH ◽  
MARC REITMAN ◽  
KENNETH A. JACOBSON

2001 ◽  
Vol 281 (4) ◽  
pp. F597-F612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin K. Jackson ◽  
Raghvendra K. Dubey

Adenosine exerts physiologically significant receptor-mediated effects on renal function. For example, adenosine participates in the regulation of preglomerular and postglomerular vascular resistances, glomerular filtration rate, renin release, epithelial transport, intrarenal inflammation, and growth of mesangial and vascular smooth muscle cells. It is important, therefore, to understand the mechanisms that generate extracellular adenosine within the kidney. In addition to three “classic” pathways of adenosine biosynthesis, contemporary studies are revealing a novel mechanism for renal adenosine production termed the “extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway.” The extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway is defined as the egress of cAMP from cells during activation of adenylyl cyclase, followed by the extracellular conversion of cAMP to adenosine by the serial actions of ecto-phosphodiesterase and ecto-5′-nucleotidase. This mechanism of extracellular adenosine production may provide hormonal control of adenosine levels in the cell-surface biophase in which adenosine receptors reside. Tight coupling of the site of adenosine production to the site of adenosine receptors would permit a low-capacity mechanism of adenosine biosynthesis to have a large impact on adenosine receptor activation. The purposes of this review are to summarize the physiological roles of adenosine in the kidney; to describe the classic pathways of renal adenosine biosynthesis; to review the evidence for the existence of the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway; and to describe possible physiological roles of the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway, with particular emphasis on the kidney.


Author(s):  
Vicent Beltran-Beltran ◽  
Noelia Benetó ◽  
Tamara Lapeña-Luzón ◽  
Laura R. Rodríguez ◽  
Federico V. Pallardó ◽  
...  

: The approval of istradefylline, an adenosine 2A receptor (A2AR) antagonist, as an add-on treatment in adult patients with Parkinson’s disease by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), is the latest proof of the importance of the adenosinergic system in the nervous system. Adenosine is an endogenous purine nucleoside with a role as a modulator of both neurotransmission and the inflammatory response. As such, the expression pattern of the 4 adenosine receptors (A1R, A2AR, A2BR and A3R) and the extracellular adenosine levels have attracted great interest in the pathogenesis and possible treatment of rare neurodegenerative diseases with motor symptoms. These include Huntington’s disease (HD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), multiple sclerosis (MS), restless legs syndrome (RLS) and Machado-Joseph disease (MJD, also known as spinocerebellar ataxia type 3, SCA3). In this review, we shall focus on the role of the different adenosine receptor subtypes in the development and possible treatment of the aforementioned rare neurodegenerative diseases with motor symptoms using the currently available data. The last section discusses the possibility of a role for the adenosine receptors in the treatment of other rare diseases based on the available molecular pathology knowledge.


2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (3) ◽  
pp. H1071-H1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ray Morrison ◽  
Rachael Jones ◽  
Anne M. Byford ◽  
Alyssa R. Stell ◽  
Jason Peart ◽  
...  

The role of A1adenosine receptors (A1AR) in ischemic preconditioning was investigated in isolated crystalloid-perfused wild-type and transgenic mouse hearts with increased A1AR. The effect of preconditioning on postischemic myocardial function, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and infarct size was examined. Functional recovery was greater in transgenic versus wild-type hearts (44.8 ± 3.4% baseline vs. 25.6 ± 1.7%). Preconditioning improved functional recovery in wild-type hearts from 25.6 ± 1.7% to 37.4 ± 2.2% but did not change recovery in transgenic hearts (44.8 ± 3.4% vs. 44.5 ± 3.9%). In isovolumically contracting hearts, pretreatment with selective A1 receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine attenuated the improved functional recovery in both wild-type preconditioned (74.2 ± 7.3% baseline rate of pressure development over time untreated vs. 29.7 ± 7.3% treated) and transgenic hearts (84.1 ± 12.8% untreated vs. 42.1 ± 6.8% treated). Preconditioning wild-type hearts reduced LDH release (from 7,012 ± 1,451 to 1,691 ± 1,256 U · l−1 · g−1 · min−1) and infarct size (from 62.6 ± 5.1% to 32.3 ± 11.5%). Preconditioning did not affect LDH release or infarct size in hearts overexpressing A1AR. Compared with wild-type hearts, A1AR overexpression markedly reduced LDH release (from 7,012 ± 1,451 to 917 ± 1,123 U · l−1 · g−1 · min−1) and infarct size (from 62.6 ± 5.1% to 6.5 ± 2.1%). These data demonstrate that murine preconditioning involves endogenous activation of A1AR. The beneficial effects of preconditioning and A1AR overexpression are not additive. Taken with the observation that A1AR blockade equally eliminates the functional protection resulting from both preconditioning and transgenic A1AR overexpression, we conclude that the two interventions affect cardioprotection via common mechanisms or pathways.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Blum ◽  
Yijuang Chern ◽  
Maria Rosaria Domenici ◽  
Luc Buée ◽  
Chien-Yu Lin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document