MR Imaging of the Peripheral Nerve

Author(s):  
Kevin Moore
Keyword(s):  
1994 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veli Soderlund ◽  
H. Goranson ◽  
H. C. F. Bauer

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1145-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Fang Zhang ◽  
Liejing Lu ◽  
Haojiang Li ◽  
Xuehua Wen ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Bhargava ◽  
David M. Parham ◽  
Olga E. Lasater ◽  
Radha S. Chari ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 247 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiko Yamabe ◽  
Toshiyasu Nakamura ◽  
Koichi Oshio ◽  
Yoshito Kikuchi ◽  
Hiroyasu Ikegami ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1076-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Shen ◽  
Xiao-Hui Duan ◽  
Li-Na Cheng ◽  
Xiao-Mei Zhong ◽  
Ruo-Mi Guo ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Du ◽  
Kurtis I. Auguste ◽  
Cynthia T. Chin ◽  
John W. Engstrom ◽  
Philip R. Weinstein

Object Treatment of spinal and peripheral nerve lesions relies on localization of the pathology by the use of neurological examination, spinal MR imaging and electromyography (EMG)/nerve conduction studies (NCSs). Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is a novel imaging technique recently developed for direct imaging of spinal and peripheral nerves. In this study, the authors analyzed the role of MRN in the evaluation of spinal and peripheral nerve lesions. Methods Imaging studies, medical records, and EMG/NCS results were analyzed retrospectively in a consecutive series of 191 patients who underwent MRN for spinal and peripheral nerve disorders at the University of California, San Francisco between March 1999 and February 2005. Ninety-one (47.6%) of these patients also underwent EMG/NCS studies. Results In those who underwent both MRN and EMG/NCS, MRN provided the same or additional diagnostic information 32 and 45% of patients, respectively. Magnetic resonance neurograms were obtained at a median of 12 months after the onset of symptoms. The utility of MRN correlated with the interval between the onset of symptoms to MRN. Twelve patients underwent repeated MRN for serial evaluation. The decrease in abnormal signal detected on subsequent MRN correlated with time from onset of symptoms and the time interval between MRN, but not with resolution of symptoms. Twenty-one patients underwent MRN postoperatively to assess persistent, recurrent, or new symptoms; of these 3 (14.3%) required a subsequent surgery. Conclusions Magnetic resonance neurography is a valuable adjunct to conventional MR imaging and EMG/NCS in the evaluation and localization of nerve root, brachial plexus, and peripheral nerve lesions. The authors found that MRN is indicated in patients: 1) in whom EMG and traditional MR imaging are inconclusive; 2) who present with brachial plexopathy who have previously received radiation therapy to the brachial plexus region; 3) who present with brachial plexopathy and have systemic tumors; and 4) in patients under consideration for surgery for peripheral nerve lesions or after trauma. Magnetic resonance neurography is limited by the size of the nerve trunk imaged and the timing of the study.


2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 802-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chhabra ◽  
R.S. Thakkar ◽  
G. Andreisek ◽  
M. Chalian ◽  
A.J. Belzberg ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 2S-51
Author(s):  
Joel L. Frazier ◽  
David S. Titelbaum ◽  
Robert I. Grossman ◽  
Peter M. Joseph ◽  
Leonard T. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document