Agrobiodiversity and agroecology: Contextualizing comparative GMO regulation

2017 ◽  
pp. 59-78
Author(s):  
Steier Gabriela
Keyword(s):  
Gmo Regulation

Time to relax GMO regulation in Europe

2007 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Drobník
Keyword(s):  
Gmo Regulation

GMO regulation and civic participation at the “edge of the world”: the case of Australia and New Zealand

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Hindmarsh ◽  
Rosemary Du Plessis
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Civic Participation ◽  
The World ◽  
Gmo Regulation

The lack of clear GMO regulation: its impact on researchers and farmers in Brazil

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (1/2/3) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisio Contini ◽  
Maria Jose Amstalden Sampaio ◽  
Antonio Flavio Dias Avila
Keyword(s):  
Gmo Regulation

scholarly journals International trade and endogenous standards: the case of GMO regulations

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAURO VIGANI ◽  
VALENTINA RAIMONDI ◽  
ALESSANDRO OLPER
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
Gravity Model ◽  
Bilateral Trade ◽  
Composite Index ◽  
Trade Flows ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Approval Process ◽  
Bilateral Trade Flows ◽  
Gmo Regulation ◽  
Bilateral Differences

AbstractThis paper quantifies the effect of GMO regulation on bilateral trade flows of agricultural products. We develop a composite index of GMO regulations and using a gravity model we show that bilateral differences in GMO regulation negatively affect trade flows. This effect is especially driven by labeling, approval process, and traceability. Our results are robust to the endogeneity of GMO standards to trade flows.

From Molecular Biology to GMO Regulation and Policy

2017 ◽  
pp. 128-132
Author(s):  
Delphine Carron
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Biology ◽  
Gmo Regulation

scholarly journals GMO Regulation in Europe: Undue Delegation, Abdication or Design Flaw?

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesco Paskalev
Keyword(s):  
European Commission ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Member States ◽  
Opting Out ◽  
Eu Legislation ◽  
Design Flaw ◽  
Opt Out ◽  
Gmo Regulation ◽  
The Eu

On 22 April 2015 the European Commission published a review of the current GMO legislation (the GM Review) and tabled a proposal for its amendment (the GM Proposal). The GM Proposal aims to allow to the member states to ban on their territory the use of GMOs authorised under the EU legislation. This is very similar to the possibility for opting out from cultivation of authorised GMOs which was finally adopted earlier this year. While this may look like a new trend, all the more interesting in the context of possible Brexit, Grexit and Danish opt-out from the provisions on Justice and Home Affairs, the present article will focus only on the GM Review, which essentially admits that the existing GMO regime is a failure.

scholarly journals Risk Regulation and Deliberation in EU Administrative Governance-GMO Regulation and Its Reform

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Weimer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Regulation ◽  
Gmo Regulation ◽  
Administrative Governance

Taming the Precautionary Principle in EC Law: Lessons from Waste and GMO Regulation

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 468-483
Author(s):  
Ilona Cheyne
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Precautionary Principle ◽  
Commercial Activity ◽  
The Precautionary Principle ◽  
Gmo Regulation ◽  
Guiding Principles ◽  
Ec Law ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractThe precautionary principle is a cornerstone of the EC's environmental policy and one of the guiding principles in the Waste Directive and GMO legislation. However, there appears to be a shift away from the use of the principle in these policy areas and a re-evaluation of the relationship between it and the commercial activity that it helps to regulate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document