Irrigation Return Flow and Quality

Author(s):  
Ramon Aragues ◽  
Kenneth Tanji
2021 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 105000
Author(s):  
Anoop Valiya Veettil ◽  
Timothy R. Green ◽  
Holm Kipka ◽  
Mazdak Arabi ◽  
Nathan Lighthart ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Damon E. Abdi ◽  
James S. Owen ◽  
Julie C. Brindley ◽  
Anna Birnbaum ◽  
Bert M. Cregg ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1142-1143
Author(s):  
J. A. Bondurant ◽  
C. E. Brockway ◽  
M. J. Brown

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1125
Author(s):  
Jung-Hun Song ◽  
Younggu Her ◽  
Soonho Hwang ◽  
Moon-Seong Kang

Irrigation return flow (RF) is a critical component of the water cycle in an agricultural watershed, influencing the flow regime of downstream river. As such, it should be accurately quantified when developing water resources management plans and practices. Although many studies have proposed ways to quantify RF, uncertainty in RF estimates has not been determined to improve reliability and credibility. This study examines how conceptual (CON) and physically-based (PHY) parameterization approaches affect RF uncertainty. Results showed that PHY had a smaller amount of RF uncertainty compared to CON, as parameters of the PHY approach could be regulated based on their physical meanings. This study also found that the application of constraints created based on the relationship between the conceptual parameter and physical characteristics of irrigated plots could effectively reduce RF uncertainty made using the CON approach. This study demonstrates the benefits of the physically-based parameterization approach and the application of constraints on conceptual parameters to RF estimation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Poch-Massegú ◽  
J. Jiménez-Martínez ◽  
K.J. Wallis ◽  
F. Ramírez de Cartagena ◽  
L. Candela

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document