scholarly journals Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to Nonparallel Creative Products

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Baer ◽  
James C. Kaufman ◽  
Claudia A. Gentile
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique ◽  
Creative Products

Note on Consensual Assessment Technique in Creativity Research

2005 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 592-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Dollinger ◽  
Marina Shafran
Keyword(s):  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Slight Modification ◽  
Present Sample ◽  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Creativity Research ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique ◽  
Creative Products ◽  
Product Creativity ◽  
Creativity Task

Amabile's Consensual Assessment Technique is commonly used in research on creative products. This study evaluates a modification of that technique which may facilitate research on creative products by calibrating nonexpert judges to expert judges in previous studies. University students ( N = 200; 59% women, M = 22.3 yr. of age, SD = 5.5) devised drawings to the Test of Creative Thinking-Drawing Production stimulus. These drawing products were rated by five artist-judges using the CAT and five psychologist-judges who first viewed 16 examples of the range of drawings in a previous study, referred to here as the modified consensual assessment technique. The 20 ratings of product creativity loaded on a single principal component, and the mean ratings correlated .91. Finally, the correlations of these ratings with other measures of creativity were nearly identical. Thus, a slight modification of the technique may be useful in programmatic research when the creativity task is not modified across studies and participants are like the present sample rather than from groups with specialized training or artistic talent.

Assessing Creativity Using the Consensual Assessment Technique

2011 ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Baer ◽  
Sharon S. McKool
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Creative Writing ◽  
Divergent Thinking ◽  
Research Proposal ◽  
Work Of Art ◽  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique ◽  
Creative Products ◽  
Assessment In Higher Education

The Consensual Assessment Technique is a powerful tool used by creativity researchers in which panels of expert judges are asked to rate the creativity of creative products such as stories, collages, poems, and other artifacts. Experts in the domain in question serve as judges; thus, for a study of creativity using stories and poems, a panel of writers and/or teachers of creative writing might judge the creativity of the stories, and a separate panel of poets and/or poetry critics might judge the creativity of the poems. The Consensual Assessment Technique is based on the idea that the best measure of the creativity of a work of art, a theory, a research proposal, or any other artifact is the combined assessment of experts in that field. Unlike other measures of creativity, such as divergent-thinking tests, the Consensual Assessment Technique is not based on any particular theory of creativity, which means that its validity (which has been well established empirically) is not dependent upon the validity of any particular theory of creativity. This chapter explains the Consensual Assessment Technique, discusses how it has been used in research, and explores ways it might be employed in assessment in higher education.

The Gold Standard for Assessing Creativity

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Baer ◽  
Sharon S. McKool
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Divergent Thinking ◽  
Research Proposal ◽  
Work Of Art ◽  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Creativity Assessment ◽  
Creativity Research ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique ◽  
Creative Products

The most widely used creativity assessments are divergent thinking tests, but these and other popular creativity measures have been shown to have little validity. The Consensual Assessment Technique is a powerful tool used by creativity researchers in which panels of expert judges are asked to rate the creativity of creative products such as stories, collages, poems, and other artifacts. The Consensual Assessment Technique is based on the idea that the best measure of the creativity of a work of art, a theory, a research proposal, or any other artifact is the combined assessment of experts in that field. Unlike other measures of creativity, the Consensual Assessment Technique is not based on any particular theory of creativity, which means that its validity (which has been well established empirically) is not dependent upon the validity of any particular theory of creativity. The Consensual Assessment Technique has been deemed the “gold standard” in creativity research and can be very useful in creativity assessment in higher education.

An Application of Amabile's Consensual Assessment Technique for Rating the Creativity of Children's Musical Compositions

2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud Hickey
Keyword(s):  
Music Teachers ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Fifth Grade ◽  
Second Grade ◽  
Seventh Grade ◽  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Musical Compositions ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique ◽  
Creative Products

Amabile has proposed that the most valid way to measure creativity is by using experts' subjective assessment of creative products—a technique she has labeled “consensual assessment.” The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of the consensual assessment technique on children's musical compositions and to determine which group of judges provides the most reliable ratings of creativity for music compositions of fourth- and fifth-grade children. The groups that were compared were music teachers, composers, theorists, seventh-grade children, and second-grade children. The interjudge reliabilities for each groups creativity ratings on 11 children's musical compositions were: composers, .04; all music teachers, .64; music theorists, .73; seventh-grade children, .61; and second-grade children, .50. Significant correlations were found between the music teachers and music theorists, and between the two groups of children. There were very weak or negative correlations between the composers' scores and the scores of the other groups.

scholarly journals Novelty and coherence in group creative processes

Psihologija ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-229
Author(s):  
Irena Ristic ◽  
Bojana Skorc ◽  
Tijana Mandic
Keyword(s):  
Group Processes ◽  
Group Creativity ◽  
Creative Processes ◽  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Creative Achievement ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique ◽  
Individual Contributions ◽  
High Level

A research of triadic creative processes was conducted based on the assumption that novelty and coherence are basic dimensions of group creativity, variations of which can explain differences in creative achievement. In a workshop, 153 students were divided in triads and created 51 chain-stories. Following the standards of Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT), eight independent judges assessed creativity, novelty and coherence in the integral stories. The most representative stories for low, middle and high creativity, were selected and subjected to further analysis. The results show that development of group creativity is conditioned by high level of novelty, and by balanced ratio of novelty and coherence that enable integration of unique ideas in group processes. Symmetrical contribution of members was not confirmed as one of the conditions, suggesting that group creativity is an emerging phenomenon, relying on relations rather than individual contributions of participants.

scholarly journals The whole is more than the sum of its parts – assessing writing using the consensual assessment technique

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Daniela Zahn ◽  
Ursula Canton ◽  
Victoria Boyd ◽  
Laura Hamilton ◽  
Josianne Mamo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique

scholarly journals Comment on “The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Beth A. Hennessey
Keyword(s):  
Reform Movement ◽  
Individual Group ◽  
Assessment Technique ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Current State ◽  
Consensual Assessment Technique ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Core Mission ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Psychology Of Creativity

AbstractIn this commentary, I applaud Glăveanu’s attempts to shake things up and introduce some much-needed disruption into the study of creativity. Glăveanu is a “ big thinker” and he is correct to worry about the growing fragmentation of the field. I share his concern that the so-called “ social psychology of creativity” really isn’t all that social. Most researchers and theorists continue to decontextualize creativity, giving little attention to the cultural and environmental factors that contribute to creativity of performance. Yet Glăveanu also presents some arguments with which I disagree. Most striking is his apparent misunderstanding of the purpose and functioning of the Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT). In addition, I am less surprised than is Glăveanu about the current state of our field. The same narrowing of research questions plagues every branch of the study of psychology. However, the tides may be changing. At the forefront of a reform movement are a number of creativity theorists and journal editors. My own hope is that as researchers are given license to expand their work to include a wide variety of experimental designs, methodologies and contexts, they will adopt as their core mission the promotion of the growth of creativity at the individual, group, societal and multi-cultural levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document