scholarly journals Growth Hormone Treatment in Short Children Born Prematurely—Data from KIGS

2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 1687-1694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret C. S. Boguszewski ◽  
Hanna Karlsson ◽  
Hartmut A. Wollmann ◽  
Patrick Wilton ◽  
Jovanna Dahlgren
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Growth Failure ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
First Year ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Provocative Test ◽  
Short Children

Context: Children born prematurely with growth failure might benefit from GH treatment. Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the first year growth response to GH treatment in short children born prematurely and to identify predictors of the growth response. Design/Patients: A total of 3215 prepubertal children born prematurely who were on GH treatment were selected from KIGS (The Pfizer International Growth Database), a large observational database. They were classified according to gestational age as preterm (PT; 33 to no more than 37 wk) and very preterm (VPT; <33 wk), and according to birth weight as appropriate for gestational age [AGA; between −2 and +2 sd score (SDS)] and small for gestational age (SGA; −2 SDS or below). Results: Four groups were identified: PT AGA (n = 1928), VPT AGA (n = 629), PT SGA (n = 519), and VPT SGA (n = 139). GH treatment was started at a median age of 7.5, 7.2, 6.7, and 6.0 yr, respectively. After the first year of GH treatment, all four groups presented a significant increase in weight gain and height velocity, with a median increase in height SDS higher than 0.6. Using multiple stepwise regression analysis, 27% of the variation in height velocity could be explained by the GH dose, GH peak during provocative test, weight and age at GH start, adjusted parental height, and birth weight SDS. The first year growth response of the children born PT and SGA could be estimated by the SGA model published previously. Conclusion: Short children born prematurely respond well to the first year of GH treatment. Long-term follow-up is needed.

scholarly journals Growth response to an individualized versus fixed dose GH treatment in short children born small for gestational age: the OPTIMA study

2009 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Jung ◽  
Christof Land ◽  
Claudia Nicolay ◽  
Jean De Schepper ◽  
Werner F Blum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
First Year ◽  
Promoting Effect ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Growth Prediction ◽  
Short Children

ObjectiveInitial GH-induced catch up growth is highly variable in short children born small for gestational age (SGA) and mainly influenced by age at start of therapy and GH dose. This study compared the first year growth-promoting effect of an individually adjusted GH dose (IAD) versus a fixed high GH dose (FHD) in pre-pubertal children born SGA with severe short stature.DesignThis was a randomized, open-label, multi-center study.MethodsThe FHD group received 0.067 mg/kg per day GH throughout the 12-month study. The IAD group initially received 0.035 mg/kg per day GH; at 3 months the Cologne growth-prediction model for first year change in height SDS was applied; if predicted change was <0.75, GH was increased to 0.067 mg/kg per day for the remaining 9 months, otherwise the initial dose was continued.ResultsIn the IAD group, 38 out of the 80 patients required the higher GH dose from month 3. From an ANCOVA for non-inferiority, mean difference in change in height SDS between IAD and FHD groups was −0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.35: −0.12), the CI for height SDS being above the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of −0.5. GH dose reductions due to IGF-I SDS >0.5 and IGFBP-3 SDS <−0.5 were performed in 4/99 FHD patients, but none of the IAD group patients. Safety data were similar between groups.ConclusionWith a mean treatment group difference of 1 cm in 12-month growth response, although statistically significant, the IAD group was considered non-inferior compared with the FHD group. Early growth prediction can be used to tailor the dose to the individual patient's needs, resulting in lower overall GH dose.

Serum leptin in short children born small for gestational age: relationship with the growth response to growth hormone treatment. The Swedish Study Group for Growth Hormone Treatment

1997 ◽  
pp. 387-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Boguszewski ◽  
J Dahlgren ◽  
R Bjarnason ◽  
S Rosberg ◽  
LM Carlsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Serum Leptin ◽  
Short Children ◽  
The Mean

The product of the obese (ob) gene, leptin, is an adipocyte-derived hormone that is involved in the regulation of appetite and body weight. This study was undertaken in order to describe the basal serum levels of leptin in prepubertal short children born small for gestational age (SGA) and their relationship with growth parameters, before and during growth hormone (GH) treatment. Eighty-nine prepubertal short children (66 boys, 23 girls; height standard deviation score (SDS), -5.4 to -2.0; age, 2.0 to 12.8 years) born SGA, 12 of whom (9 boys, 3 girls) had signs of Silver-Russell syndrome, were included in the study. Serum leptin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. Leptin levels in the children born SGA were compared with those in a reference group of 109 prepubertal healthy children born at an appropriate size for gestational age (AGA). The mean (S.D.) change in height SDS was 0.11 (0.22) during the year before the start of GH therapy (0.1 IU/kg/day) and increased to 0.82 (0.44) during the first year (P < 0.001) and to 1.28 (0.59) during the 2-year period of GH therapy (P < 0.001). The children born SGA were significantly leaner than the reference group. An inverse correlation was found between leptin and chronological age in the SGA group (r = -0.31, P < 0.01). The mean serum level of leptin in the children born SGA who were older than 5.5 years of age was 2.8 micrograms/l which was significantly lower than the mean value of 3.7 micrograms/l found in the children born AGA of the same age range. The difference remained after adjustment of leptin levels for sex, age, body mass index (BMI) and weight-for-height SDS (WHSDSSDS). Leptin correlated with WHSDSSDS (r = 0.32, P < 0.001) and BMI (r = 0.36, P < 0.01) in the reference population, but not in the SGA group. No correlation was found between leptin and spontaneous 24-h GH secretion, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I or IGF-binding protein-3 levels, or with fasting insulin or cortisol levels. Leptin levels at the start of GH treatment were correlated with the growth response over both 1 year (r = 0.46, P < 0.001) and 2 years (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) of GH therapy. Using multiple regression analysis, models including leptin levels at the start of GH therapy could explain 51% of the variance in the growth response after 1 year and 44% after 2 years of GH treatment. In conclusion, serum leptin levels are reduced in short children born SGA and are inversely correlated with chronological age. Leptin concentrations correlate with the growth response to GH treatment and might be used as a marker for predicting the growth response to GH treatment.

scholarly journals Is a Two-Year Growth Response to Growth Hormone Treatment a Better Predictor of Poor Adult Height Outcome Than a First-Year Growth Response in Prepubertal Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency?

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saartje Straetemans ◽  
Raoul Rooman ◽  
Jean De Schepper
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Adult Height ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Hormone Deficiency ◽  
First Year ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Height Gain ◽  
Design And Methods

ObjectiveThe first year response to growth hormone (GH) treatment is related to the total height gain in GH treated children, but an individual poor first year response is a weak predictor of a poor total GH effect in GH deficient (GHD) children. We investigated whether an underwhelming growth response after 2 years might be a better predictor of poor adult height (AH) outcome after GH treatment in GHD children.Design and methodsHeight data of GHD children treated with GH for at least 4 consecutive years of which at least two prepubertal and who attained (near) (n)AH were retrieved from the Belgian Register for GH treated children (n = 110, 63% boys). In ROC analyses, the change in height (ΔHt) SDS after the first and second GH treatment years were tested as predictors of poor AH outcome defined as: (1) nAH SDS &lt;−2.0, or (2) nAH SDS minus mid-parental height SDS &lt;−1.3, or (3) total ΔHt SDS &lt;1.0. The cut-offs for ΔHt SDS and its sensitivity at a 95% specificity level to detect poor AH outcome were determined.ResultsEleven percent of the cohort had a total ΔHt SDS &lt;1.0. ROC curve testing of first and second years ΔHt SDS as a predictor for total ΔHt SDS &lt;1.0 had an AUC &gt;70%. First-year ΔHt SDS &lt;0.41 correctly identified 42% of the patients with poor AH outcome at a 95% specificity level, resulting in respectively 5/12 (4.6%) correctly identified poor final responders and 5/98 (4.5%) misclassified good final responders (ratio 1.0). ΔHt SDS after 2 prepubertal years had a cut-off level of 0.65 and a sensitivity of 50% at a 95% specificity level, resulting in respectively 6/12 (5.5%) correctly identified poor final responders and 5/98 (4.5%) misclassified good final responders (ratio 1.2).ConclusionIn GHD children the growth response after 2 prepubertal years of GH treatment did not meaningfully improve the prediction of poor AH outcome after GH treatment compared to first-year growth response parameters. Therefore, the decision to re-evaluate the diagnosis or adapt the GH dose in case of poor response after 1 year should not be postponed for another year.

scholarly journals Growth failure: “idiopathic” only after a detailed diagnostic evaluation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Rapaport ◽  
Jan M Wit ◽  
Martin O Savage
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
Growth Failure ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Genetic Sequencing ◽  
Short Children ◽  
The Us ◽  
Catch Up

The terms idiopathic short stature (ISS) and small for gestational age (SGA) were first used in the 1970s and 1980s. ISS described non-syndromic short children with undefined aetiology who did not have growth hormone (GH) deficiency, chromosomal defects, chronic illness, dysmorphic features or low birth weight. Despite originating in the pre-molecular era, ISS is still used as a diagnostic label today. The term SGA was adopted by paediatric endocrinologists to describe children born with low birth weight and/or length, some of whom may experience lack of catch-up growth and present with short stature. GH treatment was approved by the FDA for short children born SGA in 2001, and by the EMA in 2003, and for the treatment of ISS in the US, but not Europe, in 2003. These approvals strengthened the terms SGA and ISS as clinical entities. While clinical and hormonal diagnostic techniques remain important, it is the emergence of genetic investigations that have led to numerous molecular discoveries in both ISS and SGA subjects. The primary message of this article is that the labels ISS and SGA are not definitive diagnoses. We propose that the three disciplines of clinical evaluation, hormonal investigation and genetic sequencing should have equal status in the hierarchy of short stature assessments and should complement each other to identify the true pathogenesis in poorly growing patients.

scholarly journals The Growth Response to Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment in Children with Isolated GH Deficiency Is Independent of the Presence of the Exon 3-Minus Isoform of the GH Receptor

2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 4171-4174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner F. Blum ◽  
Kalotina Machinis ◽  
Elena P. Shavrikova ◽  
Alexandra Keller ◽  
Heike Stobbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Stature ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Gh Deficiency ◽  
Idiopathic Short Stature ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Gh Receptor

Abstract Context: A variant of the human GH receptor (GHR) lacks a 22-amino-acid sequence derived from exon 3 (d3-GHR). It was reported that pediatric patients, born small for gestational age or with idiopathic short stature who were homozygous or heterozygous for this variant responded better to GH treatment than those homozygous for the full-length allele (fl-GHR). Objective: The objective was to study the impact of the GHR genotype on the phenotype and growth response in patients with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) treated with GH. Design: This was a retrospective, multinational, multicenter observational study. Patients: Patients with IGHD (n = 107) were recruited. Interventions: All patients received GH treatment at replacement doses. The GHR genotype (fl-GHR/fl-GHR, fl-GHR/d3-GHR, or d3-GHR/d3-GHR) was determined by PCR amplification. Main Outcome Measures: Measures included height sd score, height velocity, height velocity sd score at baseline and 1 yr of GH treatment, and their changes. Results: There was no statistically significant difference of the main outcome measures between patients with the d3-GHR allele (n = 48) and patients who were homozygous for the fl-GHR allele (n = 59). Moreover, the genotype group did not contribute significantly to the growth prediction in multiple linear regression models. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the d3-GHR allele does not affect response to GH treatment or contribute to growth predictions in patients with IGHD who received replacement doses of GH aiming to restore a normal GH status. We did not confirm the previously reported data obtained in patients small for gestational age or with idiopathic short stature who received supraphysiological GH doses.

Near-Adult Height After Growth Hormone Treatment in Children Born Prematurely—Data From KIGS

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (7) ◽  
pp. e2457-e2463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret C S Boguszewski ◽  
Martin Carlsson ◽  
Anders Lindberg ◽  
Jovanna Dahlgren ◽  
Ferah Aydin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Adult Height ◽  
Growth Hormone Treatment ◽  
Provocation Test ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
International Growth ◽  
Parental Height

Abstract Context Children born prematurely have been treated with growth hormone (GH), and a significant improvement in height during the first years of treatment has been described. Objective To evaluate the influence of prematurity on near-adult height (NAH) after GH treatment. Design KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database) was queried for children born preterm treated with GH. Setting KIGS database. Patients A total of 586 children short in stature born preterm with various GH status and with available gestational age (GA), birth weight, and NAH, all treated with GH. Intervention GH treatment. Main Outcome Measure NAH. Results Values were expressed as median. From the 586 children included, 482 born appropriate for GA (AGA; median age 8.26 years) and 104 born small for gestational age (SGA) (median age 8.54 years); 66.6% of preterm AGA had GH peak &lt; 7 µg/L during a provocation test, whereas only 8.6% of preterm SGA. Change in height standard deviation scores (SDS) from GH start to NAH after 8.04 years of GH treatment was 1.82 in preterm AGA. Respective values were 7.08 years and 1.08 SDS for preterm SGA (P &lt; 0.001); 57% of the variability of the growth response to NAH could be explained, and the distance to parental height was the strongest predictor. No significant changes in height SDS were observed from puberty start to NAH. No correlation was found with GA. GH treatment was well tolerated. Conclusion GH treatment resulted in significant improvement in height in children born preterm, particularly during prepubertal years and for those with GH deficiency. The degree of prematurity did not influence the growth response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document