growth prediction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

427
(FIVE YEARS 118)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
Vol 304 ◽  
pp. 114351
Author(s):  
Dorijan Radočaj ◽  
Mladen Jurišić ◽  
Mateo Gašparović

Agriculture ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Li-Wei Liu ◽  
Chun-Tang Lu ◽  
Yu-Min Wang ◽  
Kuan-Hui Lin ◽  
Xing-Mao Ma ◽  
...  

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth prediction is key for precise rice production. However, the traditional linear rice growth forecasting model is ineffective under rapidly changing climate conditions. Here we show that growth rate (Gr) can be well-predicted by artificial intelligence (AI)-based artificial neural networks (ANN) and gene-expression programming (GEP), with accumulated air temperatures based on growth degree day (GDD). In total, 10,246 Gr from 95 cultivations were obtained with three cultivars, TK9, TNG71, and KH147, in Central and Southern Taiwan. The model performance was evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), root mean square error (RMSE), and relative RMSE (r-RMSE) in the whole growth period (lifecycle), as well as the average and specific key stages (transplanting, 50% initial tillering, panicle initiation, 50% heading, and physiological maturity). The results in lifecycle Gr modeling showed that ANN and GEP models had comparable r (0.9893), but the GEP model had the lowest RMSE (3.83 days) and r-RMSE (7.24%). In stage average and specific key stages, each model has its own best-fit growth period. Overall, GEP model is recommended for rice growth prediction considering the model performance, applicability, and routine farming work. This study may lead to smart rice production due to the enhanced capacity to predict rice growth in the field.


2022 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 110320
Author(s):  
Xin Fang ◽  
Honghui Wang ◽  
Wenjing Li ◽  
Guijie Liu ◽  
Baoping Cai

Author(s):  
Teng Wang ◽  
Junchi Bin ◽  
Guillaume Renaud ◽  
Min Liao ◽  
Guoliang Lu ◽  
...  

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Blanca E. Garcia ◽  
Emmanuel Rodriguez ◽  
Yolocuauhtli Salazar ◽  
Paul A. Valle ◽  
Adriana C. Flores-Gallegos ◽  
...  

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Qiu Rong-Shan ◽  
Ding Ding ◽  
Han Li-Min

In order to solve the problems of low accuracy and long prediction time of traditional economic growth prediction algorithms in coastal areas, an algorithm based on impulse response function was designed to analyze economic growth prediction in coastal areas. Crawler technology is used to capture the economic data of coastal areas and normalize the captured data. Based on the processed data, the impulse response function is used to analyze the relationship between different economic variables, so as to build the PSO-LSTM model, which is used to predict the economic growth trend of coastal areas. The experimental results show that, compared with the experimental comparison algorithm, the prediction accuracy of the algorithm designed in this paper is always above 97%, and the prediction time is always below 1 s, which has certain practical significance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiyu Zhou ◽  
Douglas J. Soldat

Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for turfgrass growth. Instead of pursuing the maximum yield, most turfgrass managers use nitrogen (N) to maintain a sub-maximal growth rate. Few tools or soil tests exist to help managers guide N fertilizer decisions. Turf growth prediction models have the potential to be useful, but the currently existing turf growth prediction model only takes temperature into account, limiting its accuracy. This study developed machine-learning-based turf growth models using the random forest (RF) algorithm to estimate short-term turfgrass clipping yield. To build the RF model, a large set of variables were extracted as predictors including the 7-day weather, traffic intensity, soil moisture content, N fertilization rate, and the normalized difference red edge (NDRE) vegetation index. In this study, the data were collected from two putting greens where the turfgrass received 0 to 1,800 round/week traffic rates, various irrigation rates to maintain the soil moisture content between 9 and 29%, and N fertilization rates of 0 to 17.5 kg ha–1 applied biweekly. The RF model agreed with the actual clipping yield collected from the experimental results. The temperature and relative humidity were the most important weather factors. Including NDRE improved the prediction accuracy of the model. The highest coefficient of determination (R2) of the RF model was 0.64 for the training dataset and was 0.47 for the testing data set upon the evaluation of the model. This represented a large improvement over the existing growth prediction model (R2 = 0.01). However, the machine-learning models created were not able to accurately predict the clipping production at other locations. Individual golf courses can create customized growth prediction models using clipping volume to eliminate the deviation caused by temporal and spatial variability. Overall, this study demonstrated the feasibility of creating machine-learning-based yield prediction models that may be able to guide N fertilization decisions on golf course putting greens and presumably other turfgrass areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document