scholarly journals Author’s Response: Aromatase Inhibitors in Pubertal Boys—Clinical Implications

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 1837-1838
Author(s):  
Nelly Mauras
2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (12) ◽  
pp. 4984-4993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelly Mauras ◽  
Judith L. Ross ◽  
Priscila Gagliardi ◽  
Y. Miles Yu ◽  
Jobayer Hossain ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautier Zunquin ◽  
Denis Theunynck ◽  
Bruno Sesboüé ◽  
Pierre Arhan ◽  
Dominique Bouglé

2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 869-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Zunquin ◽  
D. Theunynck ◽  
B. Sesboue ◽  
P. Arhan ◽  
D. Bougle

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 3S50-3S57
Author(s):  
Katarína Petráková ◽  
Marta Krásenská ◽  
Dalibor Valík ◽  
Miloš Holánek ◽  
Markéta Palácová ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Rastatter ◽  
Melvin Hyman

A group of sophisticated listeners judged the nasal resonance characteristics of normal children versus children evidencing selected rhinologic disorders under three speaking conditions. Results showed that perceptions of denasality are influenced by both speakers and speaking tasks. That is, children with allergic rhinitis and edemic adenoids were perceived as being denasal when they produced VCV utterances and recited sentences. However, their resonance characteristics were deemed normal for vowel productions. Interestingly, children with severely deviated septums were judged to have normal nasal resonance under all speaking conditions. Clinical implications are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document