Medication costs harm patients with multiple sclerosis

2020 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000927
Author(s):  
Marc R. Nuwer ◽  
Kevin Patel

Governmental policies aimed to reduce costs to patients of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease modifying therapy (DMT). Closing the Part D coverage gap intended just that—to reduce patient cost burden. Hartung et al.1 found this policy ineffective. Simultaneous pharmaceutical price increases offset reductions in patients' personal costs.

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. A211 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.F.I. Banahan ◽  
M. Datar ◽  
C.M. Mendonca ◽  
Z. Shahpurwala ◽  
J.P. Bentley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642098703
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Hartung

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is chronic neuroinflammatory condition associated with significant disability. The economic burden of MS is substantial, and high and rising disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prices are the single largest drivers of healthcare expenditures. Over much of the last decade, price increases for most DMTs have surpassed 10% annually. Currently, many MS DMTs exceed US$90,000 a year and their economic value is widely debated. In addition to creating a financial burden for the healthcare system, high DMT costs negatively impact patients through unaffordable out-of-pocket costs and excessive restrictions by insurance companies. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize economic issues related to MS DMTs, including trends in pricing, relative value, and effects on patient care in the United States.


Neurology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 86 (14) ◽  
pp. 1287-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Zhang ◽  
Helen Tremlett ◽  
Stella Leung ◽  
Feng Zhu ◽  
Elaine Kingwell ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Thannhauser ◽  
Jean K. Mah ◽  
Luanne M. Metz

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Birnbaum

Background: Current disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are of benefit only in people with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). Thus, safely stopping DMTs in people with secondary progressive MS may be possible. Methods: Two groups of patients with MS were studied. Group A consisted of 77 patients with secondary progressive MS and no evidence of acute central nervous system inflammation for 2 to 20 years. These patients were advised to stop DMTs. Group B consisted of 17 individuals with RMS who stopped DMTs on their own. Both groups were evaluated at treatment cessation and for a minimum of 1 year thereafter. Multiple variables were assessed to determine those that predicted recurrent acute disease. Results: Nine patients in group A (11.7%) and ten patients in group B (58.8%) had recurrent acute disease, almost always within 1 to 2 years of stopping treatment. The only variable of significance in group A distinguishing stable and relapsing patients was age (P = .0003), with relapsing patients being younger. Group B patients were younger and had significantly lower Expanded Disability Status Scale scores than group A, with no significant differences in age between relapsed and stable patients. Conclusions: The DMTs can be stopped safely in older patients with MS (≥7 decades) with no evidence of acute disease for 2 years or longer, with an almost 90% probability of remaining free of acute recurrence. The high proportion of untreated patients with RMS experiencing recurrent acute disease is consistent with published data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document