scholarly journals Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (24) ◽  
pp. e3412-e3419
Author(s):  
Freda M. Warner ◽  
Jacquelyn J. Cragg ◽  
Catherine R. Jutzeler ◽  
Lukas Grassner ◽  
Orpheus Mach ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo explore the hypothesis that earlier administration of acute gabapentinoids is beneficial to motor recovery after spinal cord injury in humans.MethodsThis is an observational study using a cohort from the European Multi-Centre Study about Spinal Cord Injury. Patient charts were reviewed to extract information regarding the administration and timing of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants. The primary outcome measure was motor scores, as measured by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, collected longitudinally in the first year after injury. Sensory scores (light touch and pinprick) and functional measures (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) were secondary outcomes. Linear mixed effects regression models included a drug-by-time interaction to determine whether exposure to gabapentinoids altered recovery of muscle strength in the first year after injury.ResultsA total of 201 participants were included in the study and had a median age of 46 and baseline motor score of 50. Participants were mostly men (85%) with sensory and motor complete injuries (50%). Seventy individuals (35%) were administered gabapentinoids within the first 30 days after injury, and presented with similar demographics. In the longitudinal model, the administration of gabapentinoids within 30 days after injury was associated with improved motor recovery when compared to those who did not receive gabapentinoids during this time (3.69 additional motor points from 4 to 48 weeks after injury; p = 0.03). This effect size increased as administration occurred earlier after injury (i.e., a benefit of 4.68 points when administered within 5 days).ConclusionsThis retrospective, observational study provided evidence of the beneficial effect of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants on motor recovery after spinal cord injury. More critically, it highlighted a potential time dependence, suggesting that earlier intervention is associated with better outcomes.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class IV evidence that gabapentinoids improve motor recovery for individuals with acute spinal cord injury.

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kirshblum ◽  
F. Biering-Sørensen ◽  
R. Betz ◽  
S. Burns ◽  
W. Donovan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2765
Author(s):  
Yazi Al’joboori ◽  
Sarah J. Massey ◽  
Sarah L. Knight ◽  
Nick de N. Donaldson ◽  
Lynsey D. Duffell

Spinal cord stimulation may enable recovery of volitional motor control in people with chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). In this study we explored the effects of adding SCS, applied transcutaneously (tSCS) at vertebral levels T10/11, to a sit-to-stand training intervention in people with motor complete and incomplete SCI. Nine people with chronic SCI (six motor complete; three motor incomplete) participated in an 8-week intervention, incorporating three training sessions per week. Participants received either tSCS combined with sit-to-stand training (STIM) or sit-to-stand training alone (NON-STIM). Outcome measures were carried out before and after the intervention. Seven participants completed the intervention (STIM N = 5; NON-STIM N = 2). Post training, improvements in International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) motor scores were noted in three STIM participants (range 1.0–7.0), with no change in NON-STIM participants. Recovery of volitional lower limb muscle activity and/or movement (with tSCS off) was noted in three STIM participants. Unassisted standing was not achieved in any participant, although standing with minimal assistance was achieved in one STIM participant. This pilot study has shown that the recruitment of participants, intervention and outcome measures were all feasible in this study design. However, some modifications are recommended for a larger trial.


Spinal Cord ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 266-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick M Maynard ◽  
Michael B Bracken ◽  
Graham Creasey ◽  
John F Ditunno Jr ◽  
William H Donovan ◽  
...  

Spinal Cord ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Walden ◽  
L M Bélanger ◽  
F Biering-Sørensen ◽  
S P Burns ◽  
E Echeverria ◽  
...  

Spinal Cord ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 554-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle E Cohen ◽  
John F Ditunno Jr ◽  
William H Donovan ◽  
Frederick M Maynard Jr

Spinal Cord ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 994-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Armstrong ◽  
◽  
J M Clark ◽  
D T Ho ◽  
C J Payne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document