Can Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting Systems Really Be Used to Compare Rates of Adverse Events Between Drugs?

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Mertes ◽  
Anne B. Guttormsen ◽  
Torkel Harboe ◽  
S Gunnar O. Johansson ◽  
Erik Florvaag ◽  
...  
Vaccine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (44) ◽  
pp. 6760-6767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. McNeil ◽  
Iwona Paradowska-Stankiewicz ◽  
Elaine R. Miller ◽  
Paige L. Marquez ◽  
Srihari Seshadri ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 268 ◽  
pp. 441-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Kyong Lee ◽  
Jung Su Shin ◽  
Youngwon Kim ◽  
Jae Hyun Kim ◽  
Yun-Kyoung Song ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Benjamin M. Knisely ◽  
Camille Levine ◽  
Kush C. Kharod ◽  
Monifa Vaughn-Cooke

Humans can contribute to error at all stages of the medical device product life-cycle. Use error associated with medical devices can result in catastrophic consequences for end users and inefficient use of healthcare system resources. Industry-wide statistics about medical device use error has the potential to aid in identifying opportunities for human factors intervention, however publicly available statistics are sparse. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires medical device manufactures, importers, and device user facilities to track and report adverse events for post-market surveillance through medical device reports (MDRs). This data is available in an online database: Manufacturer and User Facility Experience (MAUDE). This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of use error adverse events in MAUDE (2010-2018) based on device class, device operator, and event outcome, to address the lack of industry-wide statistics on medical device use error. Results indicate that use error is significantly represented in adverse event reporting, constituting 28.1% of reports labeled with device problem codes. Events associated with patient device operators were predominately associated with diabetes-related medical devices, while provider operators were associated with a wider array of devices. Additionally, it was found that most use error reports were attributed to issues with device output; using the device in accordance with manufacturer expectations; and physically activating, positioning, or separating device components. This work demonstrates the viability of using MAUDE to attain industry wide statistics on medical device use error for later integration in industry-wide or device-specific risk mitigation strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document