The 1-Hour Versus 2-Hour Clear Liquid Fasting Pro-Con Debate: What Problem Are We Solving?

2021 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 578-580
Author(s):  
Khoa N. Nguyen ◽  
Peter J. Davis
Keyword(s):  
1960 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gerhardt ◽  
C.- G. Heden ◽  
W. J. Nungester
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Shin Jeong ◽  
Dong Il Park ◽  
Hyo Sun Seok ◽  
Seong Eun Kim ◽  
Suck-Ho Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
In Ja Yoon ◽  
Sung Hee Cho ◽  
Ju Hee Jeon ◽  
Hye Young Kim ◽  
Bo Young Yun ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 698-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Isserman ◽  
Elizabeth Elliott ◽  
Rajeev Subramanyam ◽  
Blair Kraus ◽  
Tori Sutherland ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Dettleff ◽  
Philip A. Thompson ◽  
Gerd E. A. Meier ◽  
Hans-Dieter Speckmann

The existence of a liquefaction shock wave, a compression shock which converts vapour into liquid, has recently been predicted on physical grounds. The liquefaction shock was experimentally produced as the reflected shock at the closed end of a shock tube. Measurements of pressure, temperature, index of refraction and shock velocity confirm the existence of the shock and its general conformity to classical Rankine-Hugoniot conditions, with a discrepancy ∼ 10°C between measured and predicted liquid temperatures. Photographic observations confirmed the existence of a clear liquid phase and revealed the (unanticipated) presence of small two-phase torus-form rings. These rings are interpreted as vortices and are formed in or near the shockfront (∼ 50 rings/mm2 are visible near the shockfront at any given time). Separate experiments with the incident shock under conditions of partial liquefaction produced a fog behind the shock: measurements of laser-beam attenuation yielded the thickness of the condensation zone and estimates of the droplet size (∼ 10−7 m).


2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 909-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim S. Ker

In an attempt to improve patient tolerance for colon cleaning, a reduced-volume regimen with a 2-liter electrolyte lavage solution plus 20 mg of oral bisacodyl was compared with the standard 4-liter lavage for efficacy and safety. Three hundred patients were prospectively randomized into two study groups. One group of 150 patients was given four tablets of 5 mg bisacodyl at 12:00 PM the day before their colonoscopy, followed by 2 liters of electrolyte lavage by mouth at 6:00 PM the evening before their colonoscopy. Another group of 150 patients were given 4 liters of electrolyte lavage at 6:00 PM the evening before their colonoscopy. All patients were on a clear liquid diet the day before their colonoscopy. No enema was given in either groups. The bowel cleanliness was accessed by one colonoscopist. One registered nurse accessed the comfort of patient. In the 2-liter group, only one (0.6%) patient could not finish the laxative. Colon cleanliness was 80 per cent to 100 per cent, with an average of 95.9 per cent. In the 4-liter group, 11 (7.3%) patients could not finish the laxative preparation. Colon cleanliness was 78 per cent to 100 per cent, with an average of 95.3 per cent. The study that found the 2-liter electrolyte lavage solution with four tablets of bisacodyl can achieve equally good results in bowel preparation and favorable acceptance by patients compared with the 4-liter lavage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document