scholarly journals Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Xu Chen ◽  
Hui Yang ◽  
Xi Ping Wu ◽  
Wang Niu ◽  
Lin Ding ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dexiang Wang ◽  
Jia Dong ◽  
Min Zeng ◽  
Xiaoyuan Liu ◽  
Xiang Yan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background High-grade glioma (HGG) is the most malignant brain tumor with poor outcome. Whether anesthetic methods have impact on the outcome of these patients is still unknown. Retrospective study has found that there is no difference between two anesthesia methods on the overall survival (OS), however, intravenous anesthesia with propofol might be beneficial in subgroup patients of KPS<80. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the results.Methods This is a single-centered, randomized controlled, parallel group trial. 196 patients with primary HGG for tumor resection will be randomly assigned to receive either the intravenous anesthesia with propofol or inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. The primary outcome is the OS within 18 months. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival (PFS), the numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain intensity and sleep quality, the postoperative encephaloedema volume, complications, the length and cost effectiveness of hospital stay of the patients.Discussion This is a randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of intravenous or inhalation anesthesia maintenance on the outcome of supratentorial HGG patients.The results will help to optimizing the anesthesia methods in these patients.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02756312). Registered on 27 April 2020 https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/


Neonatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgul Say ◽  
Hayriye Gozde Kanmaz Kutman ◽  
Serife Suna Oguz ◽  
Mehmet Yekta Oncel ◽  
Sema Arayici ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jason A. Webb ◽  
Arif H. Kamal

Palliative oxygen therapy is used for treating dyspnea in patients with cancer and advanced cardiopulmonary diseases, however, small trials have suggested that circulating air may be just as effective. This international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial compared oxygen versus room air delivered by a nasal cannula for relief of dyspnea for patients with any life-limiting illness. Patients were adults >18 years of age, with PaO2 > 7.3kPa, on optimized therapies for their illness, and an expected survival of >1 month. The study demonstrated no clinically significant symptomatic benefit of palliative oxygen versus room air delivered via nasal cannula for seven days in patients with life-limiting illnesses and refractory dyspnea.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document