scholarly journals Estimating animal utilization distributions from multiple data types: A joint spatiotemporal point process framework

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Watson ◽  
Ruth Joy ◽  
Dominic Tollit ◽  
Sheila J. Thornton ◽  
Marie Auger-Méthé
2016 ◽  
Vol 206 (1) ◽  
pp. 605-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Bodin ◽  
J. Leiva ◽  
B. Romanowicz ◽  
V. Maupin ◽  
H. Yuan

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blaine D. Johs ◽  
Roger H. French ◽  
Franklin D. Kalk ◽  
William A. McGahan ◽  
John A. Woollam

Space Weather ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chalachew Kindie Mengist ◽  
Nicholas Ssessanga ◽  
Se‐Heon Jeong ◽  
Jeong‐Heon Kim ◽  
Yong Ha Kim ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris North ◽  
Purvi Saraiya ◽  
Karen Duca

This study compares two different empirical research methods for evaluating information visualizations: the traditional benchmark-task method and the insight method. The methods are compared using criteria such as the conclusions about the visualization designs provided by each method, the time participants spent during the study, the time and effort required to analyse the resulting empirical data, and the effect of individual differences between participants on the results. The study compares three graph visualization alternatives that associate bioinformatics microarray time series data to pathway graph vertices in order to investigate the effect of different visual grouping structures in visualization designs that integrate multiple data types. It is confirmed that visual grouping should match task structure, but interactive grouping proves to be a well-rounded alternative. Overall, the results validate the insight method’s ability to confirm results of the task method, but also show advantages of the insight method to illuminate additional types of tasks. Efficiency and insight frequently correlate, but important distinctions are found. Categories: H.5.2 [Information Interfaces and Presentation]: User Interfaces – evaluation/methodology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Capobianco ◽  
Marco Dominietto

Treating disease according to precision health requires the individualization of therapeutic solutions as a cardinal step that is part of a process that typically depends on multiple factors. The starting point is the collection and assembly of data over time to assess the patient’s health status and monitor response to therapy. Radiomics is a very important component of this process. Its main goal is implementing a protocol to quantify the image informative contents by first mining and then extracting the most representative features. Further analysis aims to detect potential disease phenotypes through signs and marks of heterogeneity. As multimodal images hinge on various data sources, and these can be integrated with treatment plans and follow-up information, radiomics is naturally centered on dynamically monitoring disease progression and/or the health trajectory of patients. However, radiomics creates critical needs too. A concise list includes: (a) successful harmonization of intra/inter-modality radiomic measurements to facilitate the association with other data domains (genetic, clinical, lifestyle aspects, etc.); (b) ability of data science to revise model strategies and analytics tools to tackle multiple data types and structures (electronic medical records, personal histories, hospitalization data, genomic from various specimens, imaging, etc.) and to offer data-agnostic solutions for patient outcomes prediction; (c) and model validation with independent datasets to ensure generalization of results, clinical value of new risk stratifications, and support to clinical decisions for highly individualized patient management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document