Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Older Than 70 Years of Age: Analysis of Peri- and Postoperative Complications

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac O. Karikari ◽  
Peter M. Grossi ◽  
Shahid M. Nimjee ◽  
Carolyn Hardin ◽  
Tiffany R. Hodges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Hardware Complications ◽  
Lateral Interbody ◽  
Graft Subsidence

Abstract BACKGROUND: The number of spine operations performed in the elderly population is rising. OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe perioperative and postoperative complications in patients 70 years and older who have undergone minimally invasive lumbar interbody spine fusion. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 66 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older who underwent a minimally invasive interbody lumbar fusion. Electronic medical records were analyzed for patient demographics, procedures, and perioperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2009, 66 patients with an average age of 74.9 years (range, 70-86 years) underwent 68 lumbar interbody fusions procedures. The mean follow-up was 14.7 months (range, 1.5-50 months). The minimally invasive approaches included 41 cases of extreme lateral interbody fusion and 27 minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. We observed 5 major (7.4%) and 17 minor (25%) complications. The 5 major complications consisted of 4 cases of interbody graft subsidence and 1 adjacent level disease. There were no intraoperative medical complications. There were no myocardial infarctions, pulmonary embolisms, hardware complications requiring removal, wound infections, major visceral, vascular, neural injuries, or death in the study period. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive interbody fusions can be performed in the elderly (ages 70 years and older) with an overall low rate of major complications. Graft subsidence in this population when not supplemented with posterior instrumentation is a concern. Age should not be a deterrent to performing complex minimally invasive interbody fusions in the elderly.

scholarly journals Simultaneous Lateral Interbody Fusion and Posterior Percutaneous Instrumentation: Early Experience and Technical Considerations

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doniel Drazin ◽  
Terrence T. Kim ◽  
J. Patrick Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Percutaneous Instrumentation ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Simultaneous Group ◽  
Simultaneous Procedures ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Lumbar fusion surgery involving lateral lumbar interbody graft insertion with posterior instrumentation is traditionally performed in two stages requiring repositioning. We describe a novel technique to complete the circumferential procedure simultaneously without patient repositioning. Twenty patients diagnosed with worsening back pain with/without radiculopathy who failed exhaustive conservative management were retrospectively reviewed. Ten patients with both procedures simultaneously from a single lateral approach and 10 control patients with lateral lumbar interbody fusion followed by repositioning and posterior percutaneous instrumentation were analyzed. Pars fractures, mobile grade 2 spondylolisthesis, and severe one-level degenerative disk disease were matched between the two groups. In the simultaneous group, avoiding repositioning leads to lower mean operative times: 130 minutes (versus control 190 minutes;p=0.009) and lower intraoperative blood loss: 108 mL (versus 93 mL; NS). Nonrepositioned patients were hospitalized for an average of 4.1 days (versus 3.8 days; NS). There was one complication in the control group requiring screw revision. Lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous posterior instrumentation are both readily accomplished in a single lateral decubitus position. In select patients with adequately sized pedicles, performing simultaneous procedures decreases operative time over sequential repositioning. Patient outcomes were excellent in the simultaneous group and comparable to procedures done sequentially.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 861-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
Ram Vasudevan ◽  
Stefan A. Mindea
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Object Adjacent-segment degeneration and stenosis are common in patients who have undergone previous lumbar fusion. Treatment typically involves a revision posterior approach, which requires management of postoperative scar tissue and previously implanted instrumentation. A minimally invasive lateral approach allows the surgeon to potentially reduce the risk of these hazards. The technique relies on indirect decompression to treat central and foraminal stenosis and placement of a graft with a large surface area to promote robust fusion and stability in concert with the surrounding tensioned ligaments. The goal in this study was to determine if lateral interbody fusion without supplemental pedicle screws is effective in treating adjacent-segment disease. Methods For a 30-month study period at two institutions, the authors obtained all cases of lumbar fusion with new back and leg pain due to adjacent-segment stenosis and spondylosis failing conservative measures. All patients had undergone minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion from the side of greater leg pain without supplemental pedicle screw fixation. Patients were excluded from the study if they had undergone surgery for a nondegenerative etiology such as infection or trauma. They were also excluded if the intervention involved supplemental posterior instrumented fusion with transpedicular screws. Postoperative metrics included numeric pain scale (NPS) scores for leg and back pain. All patients underwent dynamic radiographs and CT scanning to assess stability and fusion after surgery. Results During the 30-month study period, 21 patients (43% female) were successfully treated using minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion without the need for subsequent posterior transpedicular fixation. The mean patient age was 61 years (range 37–87 years). Four patients had two adjacent levels fused, while the remainder had single-level surgery. All patients underwent surgery without conversion to a traditional open technique, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2 was used in the interbody space in all cases. The mean follow-up was 23.6 months. The mean operative time was 86 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 93 ml. There were no major intraoperative complications, but one patient underwent subsequent direct decompression in a delayed fashion. The leg pain NPS score improved from a mean of 6.3 to 1.9 (p < 0.01), and the back pain NPS score improved from a mean of 7.5 to 2.9 (p < 0.01). Intervertebral settling averaged 1.7 mm. All patients had bridging bone on CT scanning at the last follow-up, indicating solid bony fusion. Conclusions Adjacent-segment stenosis and spondylosis can be treated with a number of different operative techniques. Lateral interbody fusion provides an attractive alternative with reduced blood loss and complications, as there is no need to re-explore a previous laminectomy site. In this limited series a minimally invasive lateral approach provided high fusion rates when performed with osteobiological adjuvants.

scholarly journals Complication Risk in Primary and Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparable Alternative to Conventional Open Techniques?

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 619-626
Author(s):  
Cole Bortz ◽  
Haddy Alas ◽  
Frank Segreto ◽  
Samantha R. Horn ◽  
Christopher Varlotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of prospective patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar fusion at a single academic institution. Objective: To assess differences in perioperative outcomes between primary and revision MIS (minimally invasive surgical) lumbar interbody fusion patients and compare with those undergoing corresponding open procedures. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old undergoing lumbar interbody fusion were grouped by surgical technique: MIS or open. Patients within each group were propensity score matched for comorbidities and levels fused. Patient demographics, surgical factors, and perioperative complication incidences were compared between primary and revision cases using means comparison tests, as appropriate. Results: Of the 214 lumbar interbody fusion patients included after propensity score matching, 44 (21%) cases were MIS, and 170 (79%) were open. For MIS patients, there were no significant differences between primary and revision cases in estimated blood loss (EBL; 344 vs 299 cm3, P = .682); however, primary cases had longer operative times (301 vs 246 minutes, P = .029). There were no differences in length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, readmission, and intraoperative or postoperative complications (all P > .05). For open patients, there were no differences between primary and revision cases in EBL ( P > .05), although revisions had longer operative times (331 vs 278 minutes, P = .018) and more postoperative complications (61.7% vs 23.8%, P < .001). MIS revision procedures were shorter than open revisions (182 vs 213 minutes, P = .197) with significantly less EBL (294 vs 965 cm3, P < .001), shorter inpatient and intensive care unit LOS, and fewer postoperative complications (all P < .05). Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of revision MIS lumbar interbody fusion were similar to those of primary surgery. Additionally, MIS techniques were associated with less EBL, shorter LOS, and fewer perioperative complications than corresponding open revisions.

scholarly journals Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study

SAS Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Webb ◽  
Gilad J. Regev ◽  
Steven R. Garfin ◽  
Choll W. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cadaveric Study ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Minimally Invasive Single-Position Lateral Interbody Fusion With Robotic Bilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. E121-E121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey T Walker ◽  
Jakub Godzik ◽  
David S Xu ◽  
Nicholas Theodore ◽  
Juan S Uribe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Lateral interbody fusion has distinct advantages over traditional posterior approaches. When adjunctive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is required, placement from the lateral decubitus position theoretically increases safety and improves operative efficiency by obviating the need for repositioning. However, safe cannulation of the contralateral, down-side pedicles remains technically challenging and often prohibitive. In this video, we present the case of a 59-yr-old man with refractory back pain and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy that was worse on the left than right side. The patient provided written informed consent before undergoing treatment. We performed minimally invasive single-position lateral interbody fusion with robotic (ExcelsiusGPS, Globus Medical Inc, Audubon, Pennsylvania) bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of asymmetric disc degeneration, dynamic instability, and left paracentral disc herniation with corresponding stenosis at the L3-4 level. A left-sided minimally invasive transpsoas lateral interbody graft was placed with fluoroscopic guidance. Without changing the position of the patient or breaking the sterile field, an intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography image was obtained for navigational screw placement with stereotactic trackers in the iliac spine. Screw trajectories were planned using the robotic navigation software and were placed percutaneously in the bilateral L3 and L4 pedicles using the robotic arm. Concomitant lateral fluoroscopy may be used if desired to ensure the fidelity of the robotic guidance. The patient recovered well postoperatively and was discharged home within 36 h, without complication. Single-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation can be accomplished using robotic-assisted navigation and pedicle screw placement. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute.

Complications in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®): A Retrospective Study in Siriraj Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 1027-1032
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Surgical Complications ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Early Postoperative Complications ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Siriraj Hospital ◽  
Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody ◽  
Level Fusion

Background: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®) is a well-known transpsoas approach technique that confers advantages including excellent visualization, easy access to the lumbar disc, accommodation for a large anterior graft, restoration of disk height and lumbar alignment, and indirect decompression. However, no study in Thailand has investigated early postoperative complications after spinal fusion with XLIF surgery. Objective: To determine the early postoperative complication rates among Thai patients that underwent spinal fusion with XLIF procedure. Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective chart review to evaluate perioperative and early postoperative complications in patients that underwent spinal interbody fusion with XLIF procedure and were followed-up for a minimum of three months at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand between 2015 and 2019. Results: One hundred eighteen patients, including 82 females and 36 males, with a mean age of 64.2 years and 165 levels, that were operated upon, were included. Eighty patients (67.8%) underwent one-level fusion, 29 (24.6%) had two-level fusion, and 9 (7.6%) underwent three-level fusion. Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 66 patients (55.9%), consisting of eight (6.7%) with medical complications, 57 (48.3%) with surgical complications, and one (0.8%) with combined medical and surgical complications. Postoperative complications were resolved within three months after surgery in 48 patients. Forty-one patients (34.7%) had postoperative proximal lower limb neuropathy. Only 10 patients (24.4%) still had neuropathy at the 3-month follow-up, but it did not affect their function. Conclusion: Postoperative proximal limb neuropathy, including thigh numbness, pain, or hip flexor weakness, had a high prevalence in the present study despite intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring; however, most cases resolved by the 3-month follow-up. Patient education about potential nerve irritation complication is recommended, and meticulous preoperative radiographic assessment and careful step-by-step intraoperative surgical approach may reduce the rates of these postoperative complications. Keywords: Extreme lateral interbody fusion; Complications; Neuropathy; Postoperative

scholarly journals Effect of computer navigation-assisted minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with lumbar tuberculosis

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (48) ◽  
pp. e13484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianzhong Jiang ◽  
Fengping Gan ◽  
Haitao Tan ◽  
Zhaolin Xie ◽  
Xiang Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Computer Navigation ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document