Energy Loss of a Test Charge in Dusty Plasmas: Collective and Individual Particle Contributions

1999 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Nasim ◽  
Arshad M Mirza ◽  
G Murtaza ◽  
P K Shukla
2000 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 628-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Nasim ◽  
Arshad M Mirza ◽  
G Murtaza ◽  
P K Shukla

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 762-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Nasim ◽  
M. S. Qaisar ◽  
Arshad M. Mirza ◽  
G. Murtaza ◽  
P. K. Shukla

Author(s):  
Shahid Ali ◽  
Yas Al-Hadeethi

Different plasma diagnostic methods are briefly discussed, and the framework of a test charge technique is effectively used as diagnostic tool for investigating interaction potentials in Lorentzian plasma, whose constituents are the superthermal electrons and ions with negatively charged dust grains. Applying the space-time Fourier transformations to the linearized coupled Vlasov-Poisson equations, a test charge potential is derived with a modified response function due to energetic ions and electrons. For a test charge moving much slower than the dust-thermal speed, there appears a short-range Debye-Hückel (DH) potential decaying exponentially with distance and a long-range far-field (FF) potential as the inverse cube of the distance from test charge. The FF potentials exhibit more localized shielding curves for low-Kappas, and smaller effective shielding length is observed in dusty plasma compared to electron-ion plasma. However, a wakefield (WF) potential is formed behind the test charge when it resonates with dust-acoustic oscillations, whereas a fast moving test charge leads to the Coulomb potential having no shielding around. It is revealed that superthermality and plasma parameters significantly alter the DH, FF, and WF potentials in space plasmas of Saturn’s E-ring, where power-law distributions can be used for energetic electrons and ions in contrast to Maxwellian dust grains.


1968 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 811 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Lynch ◽  
JB Swan

Characteristic electron energy loss spectra are presented for the second and third series transition metals Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Rh, Pd, Ag, and Hf, Ta, W, Re, Ir, Pt, Au. An identification of most of the spectral features in terms of collective and individual particle excitations is made.


1977 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-114
Author(s):  
K.C. Swami ◽  
S.R. Sharma
Keyword(s):  

1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
P K Shukla ◽  
R N Singh
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 3858-3860 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Shukla ◽  
M. Salimullah
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3581-3587 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Nasim ◽  
Arshad M. Mirza ◽  
M. S. Qaisar ◽  
G. Murtaza ◽  
P. K. Shukla
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 1362-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Shukla
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
J. Silcox

In this introductory paper, my primary concern will be in identifying and outlining the various types of inelastic processes resulting from the interaction of electrons with matter. Elastic processes are understood reasonably well at the present experimental level and can be regarded as giving information on spatial arrangements. We need not consider them here. Inelastic processes do contain information of considerable value which reflect the electronic and chemical structure of the sample. In combination with the spatial resolution of the electron microscope, a unique probe of materials is finally emerging (Hillier 1943, Watanabe 1955, Castaing and Henri 1962, Crewe 1966, Wittry, Ferrier and Cosslett 1969, Isaacson and Johnson 1975, Egerton, Rossouw and Whelan 1976, Kokubo and Iwatsuki 1976, Colliex, Cosslett, Leapman and Trebbia 1977). We first review some scattering terminology by way of background and to identify some of the more interesting and significant features of energy loss electrons and then go on to discuss examples of studies of the type of phenomena encountered. Finally we will comment on some of the experimental factors encountered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document