scholarly journals 283 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE MIDDLE DISTANCE RUNNERS

1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S51 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Fernhall ◽  
K. Stillwell ◽  
T. Manfredi
1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee N. Cunningham

To compare the physiologic differences between adolescent male and female cross-country runners, 12 male and 12 female high school nonelite distance runners who had competed successfully at the All State 5-km championship cross-country meet were tested in the laboratory. Data were analyzed in relation to maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), ventilatory threshold (VT), and running economy (RE). Male runners were taller, heavier, had less body fat, and ran faster by 2 minutes and 18 seconds than female runners. Running economy was similar between gender. VO2 at a 215 m•min−1 pace was 46.7 ml•kg−1•min−1 for male runners and 47.8 ml•kg−1•min−1 for female runners. At the VT, males demonstrated a higher VO2 and treadmill velocity than females. Heart rate, percent HR max, and percent VO2 max at the VT were not different between gender. Males demonstrated a higher VO2 max of 74.6 versus 66.1 ml•kg−1•min−1 than female runners. The fractional utilization of VO2 at race pace was not different between males (90%) and females (91%). In conclusion, the primary physiologic determinant for performance differences between nonelite, competitive male and female adolescent distance runners is associated with VO2 max.


2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S155-S156
Author(s):  
David A. Greene ◽  
Geraldine A. Naughton ◽  
Julie N. Briody ◽  
Allan Kemp ◽  
Helen J. Woodhead ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Furst

This study investigated the attributions of successful and unsuccessful male and female distance runners given after each race during a competitive season. It was hypothesized that the 8 male and 8 female runners would be inconsistent in their support of the self-serving bias. Using the Causal Dimension Scale-II, responses showed that, as a group, the runners were consistent when coding their attributions into dimensions. When divided as to perceived success, successful runners gave more internal and stable reasons for their performance, while both groups reported high personal control and low external control.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1289-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Barnes ◽  
Michael R. Mcguigan ◽  
Andrew E. Kilding

Author(s):  
Sigurbj�rn �. Arngr�msson ◽  
Ellen M. Evans ◽  
Michael J. Saunders ◽  
Charles L. Ogburn ◽  
Richard D. Lewis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document