The Effect of Posture on Physiological Parameters in NCAA Division III College Field Hockey Players

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 698-699
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Lindsay Laamann ◽  
Michael Ward ◽  
Elaina Mertens ◽  
Tracey Matthews ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 755
Author(s):  
Dakota Burke ◽  
Stephen McGregor ◽  
Andrea Workman ◽  
Joe Williams ◽  
Adam Coughlin ◽  
...  

10.26524/1428 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Matthew Wylde ◽  
Low Chee Yong ◽  
Abdul Rashid Aziz ◽  
Swarup Mukherjee ◽  
Michael Chia

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1191-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben J. Peterson ◽  
John S. Fitzgerald ◽  
Calvin C. Dietz ◽  
Kevin S. Ziegler ◽  
Stacy J. Ingraham ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan K. Perrault

Despite being the largest subset of the NCAA, Division III sports programs have had very little research dedicated to them regarding student attendance motivations. This study surveyed 620 undergraduate students at a midsize Division III school (total enrollment 10,902) to determine their attitudes toward attending athletic events and potential motivators for getting them into the stands. Students who had personally interacted with an athlete or coach had better attitudes toward university athletics than those who had not. Results also supported predictions of the theory of planned behavior, finding that attitudes toward individual sports were the strongest predictor of intentions to attend future games. Open-ended responses also asked students why they do not attend games and what would get them to attend more games. Analyses of these responses are followed by key recommendations for communications professionals at similar-size institutions seeking ways to increase student attendance at their athletic events.


Author(s):  
Huw Rees ◽  
Ulrik McCarthy Persson ◽  
Eamonn Delahunt ◽  
Colin Boreham ◽  
Catherine Blake

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Gouttebarge ◽  
Victor Zuidema

ObjectiveThis article describes the systematic development of an intervention for the prevention of lower extremity injuries in field hockey and the assessment of its feasibility.MethodsThe intervention was developed according to the first four steps of the intervention mapping and knowledge transfer scheme processes, mostly based on focus group interviews with experts in field hockey and injury prevention (needs assessment; objective and target groups; content selection; development). Subsequently, a quasi-experimental research (one-group post-test design) was conducted among 35 young field hockey players and 7 coaches. Participants were asked to use the intervention for 3 weeks, and the degrees of relevancy, suitability, satisfaction and usability of the intervention were assessed by means of a questionnaire and a group interview.ResultsFirst, the needs assessment conducted among the main actors within recreational field hockey revealed that an injury prevention intervention was needed, ideally delivered through videos via an application for smartphone/tablet or website. Second, the objective and target groups of the intervention were defined, namely to prevent or reduce the occurrence of lower extremity injuries among both young and adult recreational field hockey players. Third, warming-up exercises were selected as preventive measures and strategies (eg, core stability, strength, coordination). Last, the ‘Warming-Up Hockey’ intervention was developed, consisting of a warm-up programme (delivered by coaches including more than 50 unique exercises). The relevancy, satisfaction and usability of ‘Warming-Up Hockey’ were positively evaluated, but two main alterations were made: the duration of the ‘Warming-up Hockey’ was reduced from 16 to 12  min and a match-specific warm-up was added.ConclusionThe feasibility of ‘Warming-Up Hockey’ was positively assessed by players and coaches. Prior to its nationwide implementation, the effectiveness of the intervention on injury reduction among field hockey players should be conducted.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 558-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell D. Kashian ◽  
Jeff Pagel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document