An approach to standardize, quantify and record progress of routine upper limb therapy for stroke subjects: The Action Medical Research Upper Limb Therapy protocol

Hand Therapy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 60-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheeba B Rosewilliam ◽  
Catherine BüCher ◽  
Christine Roffe ◽  
Anand D Pandyan

Introduction. Explicitly describing therapy for research purposes, in terms of content and quantity, improves the validity of research and facilitates evidence-based clinical practice. However, such descriptions are not common in therapy research. The aim was to develop an upper limb therapy protocol which reflected local clinical practice in the stroke unit, and a recording form to document the content, quantity and progression of therapy. Methods. This was a multi-method study. A list of interventions commonly used for the rehabilitation of the stroke upper limb was compiled following a systematic literature search. This was then refined into the Action Medical Research Upper Limb Therapy (AMRULT) protocol in a two-stage process involving a survey and a group discussion. Six physical therapists and three occupational therapists supported its development. The AMRULT protocol was then piloted in a two-arm randomized controlled trial with 90 stroke patients for therapy and recording purposes. Results. The protocol classified therapies based on therapy input as passive, active assisted, active/strengthening and functional. Using this form it was possible to not only summarize the content of therapy but also objectively document progression (e.g. 14% of the participants progressed to functional exercises between the 5th and 8th weeks after stroke onset). Discussion. The AMRULT protocol and associated recording form were useful in both standardizing the delivery and quantification (content and progression) of therapy. While the AMRULT protocol was devised for a specific purpose, the method used can be adapted to develop protocols to support other research studies.

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjo J.M. Maas ◽  
Philip J. van der Wees ◽  
Carla Braam ◽  
Jan Koetsenruijter ◽  
Yvonne F. Heerkens ◽  
...  

Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are not readily implemented in clinical practice. One of the impeding factors is that physical therapists do not hold realistic perceptions of their adherence to CPGs. Peer assessment (PA) is an implementation strategy that aims at improving guideline adherence by enhancing reflective practice, awareness of professional performance, and attainment of personal goals. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of PA with the usual case discussion (CD) strategy on adherence to CPGs for physical therapist management of upper extremity complaints. Design A single-masked, cluster-randomized controlled trial with pretest-posttest design was conducted. Intervention Twenty communities of practice (n=149 physical therapists) were randomly assigned to groups receiving PA or CD, with both interventions consisting of 4 sessions over 6 months. Both PA and CD groups worked on identical clinical cases relevant to the guidelines. Peer assessment focused on individual performance observed and evaluated by peers; CD focused on discussion. Outcomes Guideline adherence was measured with clinical vignettes, reflective practice was measured with the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS), awareness of performance was measured via the correlation between perceived and assessed improvement, and attainment of personal goals was measured with written commitments to change. Results The PA groups improved more on guideline adherence compared with the CD groups (effect=22.52; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=2.38, 42.66; P=.03). The SRIS scores did not differ between PA and CD groups. Awareness of performance was greater for the PA groups (r=.36) than for the CD groups (r=.08) (effect=14.73; 95% CI=2.78, 26.68; P=.01). The PA strategy was more effective than the CD strategy in attaining personal goals (effect=0.50; 95% CI=0.04, 0.96; P=.03). Limitations Limited validity of clinical vignettes as a proxy measure of clinical practice was a limitation of the study. Conclusions Peer assessment was more effective than CD in improving adherence to CPGs. Personal feedback may have contributed to its effectiveness. Future research should address the role of the group coach.


Addiction ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (9) ◽  
pp. 1777-1785
Author(s):  
Yee Tak Derek Cheung ◽  
Ching Han Helen Chan ◽  
Kin Sang Ho ◽  
Wai‐Yin Patrick Fok ◽  
Mike Conway ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document