Salvage of infected vascular graft via ‘perivascular venous banding’ technique coupled with rectus abdominis myocutaneous muscle flap transposition

Vascular ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
F De Santis ◽  
C M Chaves Brait ◽  
G Caravelli ◽  
S Pompei ◽  
V Di Cintio

This is the case of a severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa biological vascular graft infection, completely involving the perianastomotic tract of a femoro — femoral crossover bypass and resulting in repeated bleeding from the offended vessel wall. After the failure of a sartorious rotational muscle flap transposition into the infected groin wound, this ‘high-grade’ vascular graft infection was finally treated successfully by wrapping a great saphenous vein patch reinforcement circumferentially around the damaged biological vascular conduit and filling the infected wound with a rectus abdominis myocutaneous muscle flap transposition. The aim of this report is to illustrate this novel, to our knowledge, ‘perivascular venous banding’ technique and to evaluate the prospective of future testing of this surgical procedure. Starting from this singular case, we will also review the role of the rotational muscle flaps in the conservative management of major vascular graft infections.

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1230-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Keidar ◽  
A. Engel ◽  
A. Hoffman ◽  
O. Israel ◽  
S. Nitecki

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 393-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.T. Reilly ◽  
M.J. Grigg ◽  
D.A. Cunningham ◽  
E.J. Thomas ◽  
A.O. Mansfield

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Rawson ◽  
Dipender Gill ◽  
Jim Buckley ◽  
Sophie Renton

Author(s):  
Harry Ward ◽  
Dominic Howard

This case report focuses on the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of vascular graft infections. A complex and intriguing case is presented and the latest evidence on aetiology and management of this challenging condition are summarised. The contention regarding the diagnostic criteria for graft infection is addressed, and how different imaging modalities and genetic or systemic biomarkers could aid this diagnostic process. Key management challenges are also discussed. Firstly, the difficulties of penetration and efficacy of antimicrobials and the issues surrounding biofilm formation. Secondly, the different surgical options such as graft preservation with partial excision or muscle flap coverage, or excision and revascularisation. Further, the type of explant and the latest innovations in the field of biological grafts are considered. Overall, this case report brings to the fore the lack of structured guidelines and level 1 evidence for the diagnosis and management of vascular graft infection, and calls for a more structured, unified, multi-disciplinary approach.


VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-284
Author(s):  
Atıf Yolgosteren ◽  
Gencehan Kumtepe ◽  
Melda Payaslioglu ◽  
Cuneyt Ozakin

Summary. Background: Prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) is a complication with high mortality. Cyanoacrylate (CA) is an adhesive which has been used in a number of surgical procedures. In this in-vivo study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between PVGI and CA. Materials and methods: Thirty-two rats were equally divided into four groups. Pouch was formed on back of rats until deep fascia. In group 1, vascular graft with polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) was placed into pouch. In group 2, MRSA strain with a density of 1 ml 0.5 MacFarland was injected into pouch. In group 3, 1 cm 2 vascular graft with PET piece was placed into pouch and MRSA strain with a density of 1 ml 0.5 MacFarland was injected. In group 4, 1 cm 2 vascular graft with PET piece impregnated with N-butyl cyanoacrylate-based adhesive was placed and MRSA strain with a density of 1 ml 0.5 MacFarland was injected. All rats were scarified in 96th hour, culture samples were taken where intervention was performed and were evaluated microbiologically. Bacteria reproducing in each group were numerically evaluated based on colony-forming unit (CFU/ml) and compared by taking their average. Results: MRSA reproduction of 0 CFU/ml in group 1, of 1410 CFU/ml in group 2, of 180 200 CFU/ml in group 3 and of 625 300 CFU/ml in group 4 was present. A statistically significant difference was present between group 1 and group 4 (p < 0.01), between group 2 and group 4 (p < 0.01), between group 3 and group 4 (p < 0.05). In terms of reproduction, no statistically significant difference was found in group 1, group 2, group 3 in themselves. Conclusions: We observed that the rate of infection increased in the cyanoacyrylate group where cyanoacrylate was used. We think that surgeon should be more careful in using CA in vascular surgery.


2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 610-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mirzaie ◽  
J.D. Schmitto ◽  
T. Tirilomis ◽  
S. Fatehpur ◽  
O.J. Liakopoulos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document