scholarly journals Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
K de Faria Vasconcelos ◽  
KM Evangelista ◽  
CD Rodrigues ◽  
C Estrela ◽  
TO de Sousa ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 20150265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Jiao Guo ◽  
Zhi-pu Ge ◽  
Ruo-han Ma ◽  
Jian-xia Hou ◽  
Gang Li

Author(s):  
Masahiro Iikubo ◽  
Kaoru Kobayashi ◽  
Akira Mishima ◽  
Shinji Shimoda ◽  
Takayoshi Daimaruya ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingmei Yang ◽  
Xinyi Li ◽  
Dingyu Duan ◽  
Lin Bai ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 20160030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samaneh Bayat ◽  
Ahmad Reza Talaeipour ◽  
Fatemeh Sarlati

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Christiaens ◽  
Ruben Pauwels ◽  
Bassant Mowafey ◽  
Reinhilde Jacobs

Abstract BackgroundThe use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in dentistry started in the maxillofacial field, where it was used for complex and comprehensive treatment planning. Due to the reduced radiation dose compared to a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, CBCT has become a frequently used diagnostic tool in dental practice. However, published data on the accuracy of CBCT in the diagnosis of the buccal bone level is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of intra-oral radiography (IOR) as well as CBCT in the diagnosis of the extent of buccal bone loss.MethodsA dry skull was used to create a buccal bone defect at the most coronal level of a first premolar; the defect was enlarged apically in steps of 1 mm. After each step, IOR and CBCT were taken. Based on CBCT data 2 observers jointly selected 3 axial slices at different levels of the buccal bone, as well as one transverse slice. Six dentists participated in radiographic observations. First, all observers received the 10 intra-oral radiographs and each observer was asked to rank the intra-oral radiographs on the extent of the buccal bone defect. Afterwards, the procedure was repeated with the CBCTs based on a combination of axial and transverse information. For the second part of the study, each observer was asked to evaluate axial as well as transverse CBCT slices on the presence or absence of a buccal bone defect. ResultsThe percentage of buccal bone defect progression rankings that were within 1 of the true rank was 32% for IOR and 42% for CBCT. On average, kappa values were increased by 0.384 for CBCT compared with intra-oral radiography. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CBCT in the diagnosis of the presence or absence of a buccal bone defect was 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. The average area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC was 0.892 for all observers.ConclusionWhen CBCT images are available for justified indications, other than bone level assessment, such 3D images are more accurate and thus preferred to 2D images to assess periodontal buccal bone. For other clinical applications, intra-oral radiography remains the standard method for radiographic evaluation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (27) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Mihaela Stoica ◽  
Monica Monea ◽  
Ramona Vlad ◽  
Dragos Dan Sita ◽  
Mircea Buruian

Objectives: The aim of our study was to highlight the advantages of using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the study of the extent of the alveolar bone loss, compared to the conventional intraoral radiography and to prove the boon of the CBCT scans for establishing the correct periodontal diagnosis. Material and methods: A total of 16 patients with age between 35-55 years old, and a minimum of 8 teeth per dental arcade, presenting peridontal clinical symptomatology were selected. We used a custom periodontal chart that included the measuring of the gingival recession and the pocket depth in 6 points for 16 teeth, 8 maxillary teeth and 8 mandibulary teeth in all cases. For the radiographic evaluation we used CBCT imaging and intraoral radiography. Results: CBCT scans offers the possibilities of measuring with accuracy the alveolar bone loss on mesial, distal vestibular and oral sides. It provides images with the exact position of the bone and also the expediency to assess the correct diagnosis. Retroalveolar radiography offers just a hint of the possible position of the alveaolar bone in all cases the anatomical details were offered by CBCT. Conclusions: A correct periodontal diagnosis using conventional radiography is not possible because of the superimposition of the anatomical structures. The importance of CBCT imaging is no longer disputed, at the present time it is the best radiographic investigation available.


2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirikarn Phothikhun ◽  
Supreda Suphanantachat ◽  
Vannaporn Chuenchompoonut ◽  
Kanokwan Nisapakultorn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document