scholarly journals The role of ribosome recycling factor in dissociation of 70S ribosomes into subunits

RNA ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1317-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. HIROKAWA
2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 3788-3798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Inokuchi ◽  
Akikazu Hirashima ◽  
Yasuhiko Sekine ◽  
Laszlo Janosi ◽  
Akira Kaji

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Kiran Koripella ◽  
Ayush Deep ◽  
Ekansh K. Agrawal ◽  
Pooja Keshavan ◽  
Nilesh K. Banavali ◽  
...  

AbstractRibosomes are recycled for a new round of translation initiation by dissociation of ribosomal subunits, messenger RNA and transfer RNA from their translational post-termination complex. Mitochondrial ribosome recycling factor (RRFmt) and a recycling-specific homolog of elongation factor G (EF-G2mt) are two proteins with mitochondria-specific additional sequences that catalyze the recycling step in human mitochondria. We have determined high-resolution cryo-EM structures of the human 55S mitochondrial ribosome (mitoribosome) in complex with RRFmt, and the mitoribosomal large 39S subunit in complex with both RRFmt and EF-G2mt. In addition, we have captured the structure of a short-lived intermediate state of the 55S•RRFmt•EF-G2mt complex. These structures clarify the role of a mitochondria-specific segment of RRFmt in mitoribosome recycling, identify the structural distinctions between the two isoforms of EF-Gmt that confer their functional specificity, capture recycling-specific conformational changes in the L7/L12 stalk-base region, and suggest a distinct mechanistic sequence of events in mitoribosome recycling. Furthermore, biochemical and structural assessments of the sensitivity of EF-G2mt to the antibiotic fusidic acid reveals that the molecular mechanism of antibiotic resistance for EF-G2mt is markedly different from that exhibited by mitochondrial elongation factor EF-G1mt, suggesting that these two homologous mitochondrial proteins have evolved diversely to negate the effect of a bacterial antibiotics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Inokuchi ◽  
Fabio Quaglia ◽  
Hideko Kaji ◽  
Akira Kaji

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefen Beeler-Duden ◽  
Meltem Yucel ◽  
Amrisha Vaish

Abstract Tomasello offers a compelling account of the emergence of humans’ sense of obligation. We suggest that more needs to be said about the role of affect in the creation of obligations. We also argue that positive emotions such as gratitude evolved to encourage individuals to fulfill cooperative obligations without the negative quality that Tomasello proposes is inherent in obligations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Whiten

Abstract The authors do the field of cultural evolution a service by exploring the role of non-social cognition in human cumulative technological culture, truly neglected in comparison with socio-cognitive abilities frequently assumed to be the primary drivers. Some specifics of their delineation of the critical factors are problematic, however. I highlight recent chimpanzee–human comparative findings that should help refine such analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document