Developing of the Adolescent’s General Sexual Attitude Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 356-365
Author(s):  
贤才 欧
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Sexual Attitude ◽  
Attitude Scale

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale Among Pregnant Women

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Maria Iliadou ◽  
Katerina Lykeridou ◽  
Panagiotis Prezerakos ◽  
Chara Tzavara ◽  
Styliani Tziaferi
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Infant Feeding ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Attitude Scale ◽  
Greek Version

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the 24-item Dysfunctional Attitude Scale

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 362-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyuki Tajima ◽  
Tsuyoshi Akiyama ◽  
Hatsue Numa ◽  
Yoshiya Kawamura ◽  
Yoshie Okada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Attitude Scale ◽  
Automatic Thoughts ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Dysfunctional Attitude ◽  
Three Samples ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dysfunctional Attitude Scale

Background:The 24-item Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS-24) is a short version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, which is a self-report inventory for depressogenic schemata.Objective:The object of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the DAS-24 (DAS-24-J).Methods:Subjects consisted of non-clinical sample 1 (248 university students), non-clinical sample 2 (872 Japanese company employees) and a clinical sample (59 depressed out-patients).Results:Internal consistency was satisfactory in all three samples, Cronbach’s α coefficient being higher than 0.85. Test–retest reliability was satisfactory in non-clinical sample 1. The interclass correlation coefficient was 0.79 and there was no significant difference in the average score of DAS-24-J between the two points. The DAS-24-J showed satisfactory concurrent validity with the Japanese Irrational Belief Test-20 (r= 0.76); Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire – Revised total (r= 0.46), negative (r= 0.53) and positive (r=−0.41); and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (r= 0.44 for non-clinical sample, r= 0.63 for clinical sample). The clinical sample showed a significantly higher DAS-24-J score than non-clinical sample 2. According to a factor analysis combining all three samples, three factors were extracted: factor 1 (11 items) corresponded with ‘achievement’ in the original version, factor 2 (6 items) with ‘self-control’ and factor 3 (5 items) with ‘dependency’.Conclusion:The DAS-24-J is a reliable and valid instrument to measure depressogenic schemata in Japanese.

scholarly journals Rambu-rambu Penyusunan Skala Sikap Model Likert untuk Mengukur Sikap Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-304
Author(s):  
Mawardi Mawardi
Keyword(s):  
Student Behavior ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Attitude Scale ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Attitude Measurement ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Attitude Assessment ◽  
Emotional Life ◽  
Attitude Object ◽  
Blue Print

The general finding shows that the assessment instrument for attitude domain contained in each of the sub-theme in Buku Guru SD / MI,  uses the rubric of student behavior observations, even though theoretically the nature of attitude is not the same as behavior, this shows the problem in the implementation of the Curriculum 2013. Ideally, the attitude domain assessment uses attitude measurement instruments, which include components of cognition, affection, and conation. Cognition is related to beliefs (beliefs, ideas, and concepts). The affection component concerns a person's emotional life, while the conation component is a tendency to behave. The three components of attitude do not stand alone, but interact with one another in a complex way. To overcome this problem, direction needs to be prepared for the correct attitude assessment instrument, especially containing the nature of attitudes and their differences with behavior, how to measure attitudes, and how to arrange the attitude scale of the Likert model. The steps in preparing the Likert model attitude scale include are: 1) compiling the attitude object statement; (2) conducting instrument trials; (3) determiinge the score for each statement (instrument blue-print); (4) analyzing items to determine the reliability and validity of the instrument.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document