Analysis of the Physical and Radiobiological Equivalence of the Calculated and Measured Dose Distributions for Prostate Stereotactic Radiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
E. Sukhikh ◽  
L. Sukhikh ◽  
A. Vertinsky ◽  
P. Izhevsky ◽  
I. Sheino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Dose Distribution ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Anterior Wall ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Stereotactic Radiation ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Gamma Index ◽  
Measured Dose

Purpose: Carrying out the analysis of the physical and radiobiological equivalence of dose distributions obtained during the planning of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of the prostate cancer and verification using a three-dimensional cylindrical dosimeter. Material and Methods: Based on the anatomical data of twelve patients diagnosed with prostate carcinoma, stage T2N0M0 with low risk, plans were developed for stereotactic radiation therapy with volumetric modulates arc therapy (VMAT). The dose per fraction was 7,25 Gy for 5 fractions (total dose 36,25 Gy) with a normal photon energy of 10 MV. The developed plans were verified using a three-dimensional cylindrical ArcCHECK phantom. During the verification process, the three-dimensional dose distribution in the phantom was measured, based on which the values of the three-dimensional gamma index and the dose–volume histogram within each contoured anatomical structures were calculated with 3DVH software. The gamma index value γ (3 %, 2 mm, GN) at a threshold equal to 20 % of the dose maximum of the plan and the percentage of coincidence of points at least 95 % was chosen as a criterion of physical convergence of the calculated and measured dose distribution according to the recommendations of AAPM TG-218. To analyze the radiobiological equivalence of the calculated and measured dose distribution, the local control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) criteria were used based on the calculated and measured dose–volume histograms. Contours of the target (PTV) and the anterior wall of the rectum were used for the analysis. The approach based on the concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) by A. Niemierko was used to calculate the values of TCP/NTCP criteria. Results: The results of physical convergence of plans for all patients on the contour of the whole body were higher than 95 % for the criteria γ (3 %, 2 mm, GN). The convergence along the PTV contour is in the range (75.5–95.2)%. The TCP and NTCP values obtained from the measured dose-volume histograms were higher than the planned values for all patients. It was found that the accelerator delivered a slightly higher dose to the PTV and the anterior wall of the rectum than originally planned. Conclusion: The capabilities of modern dosimetric equipment allow us move to the verification of treatment plans based on the analysis of TCP / NTCP radiobiological equivalence, taking into account the individual characteristics of the patient and the capabilities of radiation therapy equipment.

A comparison of proton and photon radiotherapy in reducing cardiac exposure for patients receiving radiation therapy for distal and esophagogastric junction cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 167-167
Author(s):  
Ted Chen-Tai Ling ◽  
Jerry Monroe Slater ◽  
Rachel Mifflin ◽  
Prashanth Nookala ◽  
Roger Grove ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Esophagogastric Junction ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Partial Volumes ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Adequate Coverage

167 Background: Recent studies indicate that radiation exposure to heart may have a greater impact on perioperative cardiac morbidities than do other clinical factors. The purpose of this study is to investigate dose distributions of proton and photon treatment plans in patients (pts) with distal and esophagogastric junction (GEJ) carcinoma, focusing specifically on dose reduction to cardiac structures. Methods: Ten pts between 2010 and 2013 were included in this study. Three separate plans were generated for each patient: 3D proton plan, 3D photon plan, and Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) photon plan. The clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of the pre-operative extent of tumor plus a 10mm manual expansion in all directions. The planning target volume (PTV) was generated by a further expansion on the CTV ranging from 10-15mm. A dose of 50.4Gy given in 28 fractions was delivered to the PTV. All plans were optimized to allow 90% isodose coverage of at least 95% of the PTV. Dose-volume histograms were calculated and analyzed in order to compare plans between the three modalities. ANOVA and two-tailed paired t-tests were performed for all data parameters. Results: The 3D proton plans showed decreased dose to partial volumes of the entire heart, arteries, valves, atria, and ventricles in comparison to both the IMRT and 3D photon plans (see Table). The IMRT plans showed decreased dose delivered to the LAD artery, pericardium, and atria in comparison to the 3D photon plans (see Table). Conclusions: For pts receiving radiation therapy for distal esophageal and GEJ cancer, proton plans are technically feasible with adequate coverage while resulting in lower dose to cardiac structures. This may result in decreased cardiac toxicity and less complications in a multimodality setting. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Radiobiological Evaluation of Dosimetric Plans for Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer According to Fractionation Regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 263-269
Author(s):  
E. S. Sukhikh ◽  
I. N. Sheyno ◽  
L. G. Sukhikh ◽  
A. V. Taletskiy ◽  
A. V. Vertinskiy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Rectal Wall ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Anterior Rectal Wall ◽  
Tumor Control Probability ◽  
Equivalent Uniform Dose ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Fractionation Regimen

Objective. To determine the most effective irradiation regimen (total dose and dose per fraction) for hypofractionated treatment for prostate carcinomas according the TCP/NTCP radiobiological criteria.Material and methods. Using the tomographic information of five patients with low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma as an example, the authors devised dosimetric radiation therapy plans using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) procedure. They considered the range of total doses of 33.5 to 38 Gy administered in 4 and 5 fractions. Based on the equivalent uniform dose concept proposed by A. Niemierko and on the computed differential dose volume histograms, the investigators modeled local tumor control probability (TCP) values, by taking into account the uncertainties of main radiobiological parameters, and estimated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for the anterior rectal wall as the organ most at risk of irradiation. An effective dosimetric plan was selected according to the UTCP criterion and the probability of complication-free tumor control, i.e. TCP (1 – NTCP).Results. The results of modeling the UTCP criterion show that with a higher total dose, the TCP value increases and so does the NTCP value, therefore the optimal radiation therapy plans are to irradiate with a total dose of 34 Gy over 4 fractions or with a dose of 36–37 Gy over 5 fractions. The difference between the fractionation regimens is that the UTCP value is achieved with a higher TCP value over 4 fractions and with a lower load on the rectal wall over 5 fractions.Conclusion. The choice of a specific fractionation regimen should be determined from the calculated values of differential dose volume histograms for each patient, as well as from radiobiological criteria, such as TCP, NTCP and UTCP.

The mean absolute dose deviation–A common metric for the evaluation of dose-volume histograms in radiation therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Vinh-Hung ◽  
Nicolas Leduc ◽  
Dirk Verellen ◽  
Claire Verschraegen ◽  
Giovanna Dipasquale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
The Mean
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document