scholarly journals Establishing an evaluation tool for trauma team leader performance during trauma resuscitation

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (28) ◽  
pp. 38-43
Author(s):  
Faiz Tuma ◽  
Aussama Nassar ◽  
Theresa Elder ◽  
Susan Reid

Introduction: Trauma training is an important part of medical and surgical education.Evaluation of training is an essential part of medical education. A formal valid assessmentmethod for trauma training is not available. The purpose of this study is to establish a formaland scientifically-based Trauma Team Leader Evaluation Tool.Methods and Results: A literature review was conducted on the assessment of traumateam leaders. The available published studies were reviewed and assessed, as well asreferences on the principles and practice of assessment methods used in medical education.Input on points of assessment was obtained from trauma team leaders at the HamiltonGeneral Hospital. An evaluation form was formulated with five domains, each containing fiveitems. Definitions of the domains and items were clarified and attached to the form. The formwas reviewed and revised by trauma team leaders of adult trauma and education leadersin pediatric trauma at Hamilton General Hospital and Health Science Education ProgramMcMaster University and then finalized based on the discussed suggestions.Conclusions: Assessment of trauma team leader performance is an important part oftrauma training and feedback. Developing an assessment tool involves a comprehensiveprocess that needs review, input, and participation from various sources related to trauma.More work to validate the tool will be needed to evaluate its utility.

Author(s):  
M. Sugrue ◽  
M. Seger ◽  
R. Kerridge ◽  
D. Sloane ◽  
S. Deane

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Lavoie ◽  
Eva Tsakonas ◽  
John S. Sampalis ◽  
Pierre Fréchette

2019 ◽  
pp. 240-241
Author(s):  
Dr. Muhammad Aasam Masoom Maan

Head, Neck and Dental Emergencies is a welcome addition to the popular pocket reference Oxford paperback series. The Second Edition is a revised and upgraded version of the original which was published in 2005. As is evident from the title, the genre revolves explicitly around trauma and other critical conditions involving the major organs residing above the collar bone. The book imparts an in-depth view into the medical and dental aspects of emergencies encountered primarily in the Oral and Maxillofacial setting. The editor, Dr. Mike Perry, is a consultant Maxillofacial Surgeon and Trauma team leader at the University Hospital of North Staffordshire, United Kingdom, who, along with a handful of noteworthy contributors, aptly bestow extensive expertise throughout the course of the book.


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Mo ◽  
Nathan N. O'Hara ◽  
Ross Hengel ◽  
Alexander R. Cheong ◽  
Ash Singhal

CJEM ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. Burns ◽  
Natalie L. Yanchar

ABSTRACT Background: Unlike in adults, there are currently no standardized, validated guidelines to aid practitioners in clearing the pediatric cervical spine (C-spine). Many pediatric centres in Canada have locally produced, adult-modified guidelines, but the extent to which these or other guidelines are used is unknown. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if Canadian physicians are using either locally produced or adult C-spine guidelines to clear the C- spines of patients < 16 years of age. The study also characterized the common methods used by physicians to clear pediatric C-spine injuries in terms of clinical examination and radiologic imaging. Methods: A 20-question survey was distributed to 240 Canadian pediatric emergency physicians and trauma team leaders using the Dillman Total Design Method. Results: The response rate was 68%. The results showed that 61% of physicians currently use guidelines to assist in the clearance of pediatric C-spines. Of those physicians not using guidelines, 85% stated that they would use them if they were available. The clinical criteria most often used to clear pediatric C-spines were a normal neurologic examination (97%) and the absence of C-spine tenderness (95%), intoxication (94%), and distracting injuries (87%). Conclusions: Guidelines are commonly used by Canadian physicians when clearing the pediatric C-spine, yet few are validated in children. Those most commonly used are locally developed guidelines, the Canadian C-spine guidelines, or National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 156-157
Author(s):  
Sergio Márquez-Peláez ◽  
Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea ◽  
José Asua ◽  
Teresa Molina-Lopez ◽  
José Luis Castro-Campos ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION:The Spanish National Network (REDETS) is a group of eight agencies, units and services, depending on National and Regional Governments that coordinate their work within a common methodological framework, guided by the principles of mutual recognition and cooperation. The necessity of considering a Quality Management System has been detected and, consequently, a common tool for all the members needs to be developed. We describe in this study the process to achieve that goal.METHODS:Based on both a review of previous literature and the proposal for a self-evaluating tool, a group of experts from each agency through consensus have developed a tool for self-evaluation in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies. Through the structure described in the handbook of the Andalusian Agency for Healthcare Quality (ACSA), each standard should have a statement or proposal that needs to also include evidence or good practices, and the corresponding evaluation questions. In separate workgroups, the definition of these proposals, evidence and evaluation questions were developed. One face-to-face meeting and two meetings via teleconference were necessary to achieve a final document with all the quality standards.RESULTS:From a proposed structure of sixty-six standards, the titles, definitions, statements and evidence as well as good practices and evaluation questions were established in workgroups with consensus among all of the members (1 - 3). The final version of the self-assessment tool was composed of sixty-eight standards, grouped in twelve quality criteria structured in four dimensions: I Responsibility, II Clients and Stakeholders, III Production Process, and IV Resources.CONCLUSIONS:Quality management requires an evaluation tool and this version, based on a systematic review and consensus, is a useful and practical instrument for developing a handbook by each member of REDETS. An online version of the tool is in process of development.


Surgery Today ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-267
Author(s):  
Zhi-Jie Hong ◽  
Cheng-Jueng Chen ◽  
De-Chuan Chan ◽  
Teng-Wei Chen ◽  
Jyh-Cherng Yu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document