scholarly journals Competing Combinatorial Auctions

Author(s):  
Thomas Kittsteiner ◽  
Marion Ott ◽  
Richard Steinberg

Combinatorial auctions are auctions in which bids can be submitted on sets of items, rather than just on individual items. These auctions are generally beneficial to both auctioneers and bidders, as they allow bidders to express their synergies for sets of items. In recent years, we have seen the advent of combinatorial auctions as well as the emergence of online market platforms with competing auctioneers. However, combinatorial auctions have largely been absent from these platforms. Our article provides an explanation for this absence by demonstrating that competition between auctioneers can reduce the attractiveness of offering combinatorial auctions. Specifically, we show that auctioneers can limit competitive pressure between themselves by allowing bids only on specific packages, where these packages differ between auctioneers. This results in market segmentation, which increases bidder competition, and consequently increases auctioneer revenues. These findings have implications for market design. In particular they imply that, for an online market platform having multiple sellers offering auctions to the same set of buyers, it might not be advantageous to offer combinatorial auctions as a design option to the competing sellers.

Author(s):  
Elisabetta Iossa ◽  
Patrick Rey ◽  
Michael Waterson

Abstract We study competition for the market in a setting where incumbents (and, to a lesser extent, neighbouring incumbents) benefit from a cost or information advantage. We first compare the outcome of staggered and synchronous tenders, before drawing the implications for market design. We find the timing of tenders interrelates with the likelihood of monopolisation. For high incumbency advantages and/or discount factors monopolisation is expected, in which case synchronous tendering is preferable as it strengthens the pressure that entrants exercise on the monopolist. For low incumbency advantages and/or discount factors other firms remain active, in which case staggered tendering is preferable as it maximises competitive pressure coming from the other firms. We use bus tendering in London to illustrate our insights and draw policy implications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Dayoung Kim ◽  
Donghee Kim ◽  
Jungsuk Oh
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document