scholarly journals Shareholder Wealth Effects of Modern Slavery Regulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 5265-5289
Author(s):  
Paul Cousins ◽  
Marie Dutordoir ◽  
Benn Lawson ◽  
João Quariguasi Frota Neto

We examine the shareholder wealth effects of the adoption of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA). The MSA’s Transparency in Supply Chains clause introduced new reporting requirements mandating certain firms to provide an annual statement outlining how they identify and mitigate modern slavery in their business and supply chain. An event study of stock price reactions of UK firms covered by the MSA to eight events associated with its adoption provides no evidence of abnormal stock returns. We do, however, uncover significant cross-sectional differences in stock price reactions, with results suggesting that the MSA provides a competitive advantage to firms with a demonstrated track record of addressing slavery risk. We find no effects for preregulatory corporate social responsibility disclosure levels on stock price reactions. Our findings highlight the economic value of maintaining socially responsible sourcing practices and inform the current policy debate on the importance of greater transparency in corporate supply chains. This paper was accepted by Gad Allon, operations management.

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amar Gande ◽  
Craig M. Lewis

AbstractThis paper documents significantly negative stock price reactions to shareholder-initiated class action lawsuits. We find that shareholders partially anticipate these lawsuits based on lawsuit filings against other firms in the same industry and capitalize part of these losses prior to a lawsuit filing date. We show that the more likely a firm is to be sued, the larger the partial anticipation effect (shareholder losses capitalized prior to a lawsuit filing date) and the smaller the filing date effect (shareholder losses measured on the lawsuit filing date). Our evidence suggests that previous research that typically focuses on the filing date effect understates the magnitude of shareholder losses, and that such an understatement is greater for firms with a higher likelihood of being sued.


2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Zabihollah Rezaee ◽  
Phil Malone ◽  
Ghassem Homaifar

This paper examines Multinational Stock Price reactions to foreign currency translation, using three alternative residual methodologies. The results reveal that when a crude measure such as Mean Adjusted Return, which makes not explicit risk adjustments is used, the null hypothesis of zero abnormal return is rejected in three out of six events. However, market and risk adjusted residual returns reveal that the null hypothesis of zero abnormal return cannot be rejected.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1548-1549
Author(s):  
Sajad Fayezi ◽  
Amy Benstead ◽  
Stefan Gold ◽  
Robert Klassen ◽  
Luk Van Wassenhove

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-610
Author(s):  
Sajad Fayezi ◽  
Amy Benstead ◽  
Stefan Gold ◽  
Robert Klassen ◽  
Luk Van Wassenhove

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Dutordoir ◽  
Frank H.M. Verbeeten ◽  
Dominique De Beijer

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 3320-3321
Author(s):  
Sajad Fayezi ◽  
Amy Benstead ◽  
Stefan Gold ◽  
Robert Klassen ◽  
Luk Van Wassenhove

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document