price reactions
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

184
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyang Val Sun ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Tina Prodromou

Purpose This study aims to investigate which stock characteristics and corporate governance variables affect stock price overreaction and volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Design/methodology/approach A set of stock characteristics and corporate governance variables which may affect price overreaction and volatility were identified following a review of the literature. A dummy variable was created for the cross-sectional analysis to take into account the unique sector effect in the consumer staples sector. Out of sample analysis was conducted to confirm the robustness of the main results. Findings The empirical results consistently show that size, dividend and trading volume determine the stock price reactions when the market is in turmoil during the pandemic period. Board size and average board tenure exhibit moderate effects on reducing the stock price reactions, but the effects become insignificant while controlling for the firm characteristics in the regressions. The results remain robust when tested out of the sample. More interestingly, a consumer staples sector effect is identified and tested. The test results show that the consumer staples sector effect mitigates the stock price reactions. Practical implications The results have practical implications for investors who aim to manage desired levels of risk in their portfolios during the pandemic. The results also provide meaningful insights to stock market speculators regarding pandemic-related speculation opportunities. Originality/value This study makes a meaningful connection between the irrational stock market anomalies and the COVID-19 pandemic.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 5265-5289
Author(s):  
Paul Cousins ◽  
Marie Dutordoir ◽  
Benn Lawson ◽  
João Quariguasi Frota Neto

We examine the shareholder wealth effects of the adoption of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA). The MSA’s Transparency in Supply Chains clause introduced new reporting requirements mandating certain firms to provide an annual statement outlining how they identify and mitigate modern slavery in their business and supply chain. An event study of stock price reactions of UK firms covered by the MSA to eight events associated with its adoption provides no evidence of abnormal stock returns. We do, however, uncover significant cross-sectional differences in stock price reactions, with results suggesting that the MSA provides a competitive advantage to firms with a demonstrated track record of addressing slavery risk. We find no effects for preregulatory corporate social responsibility disclosure levels on stock price reactions. Our findings highlight the economic value of maintaining socially responsible sourcing practices and inform the current policy debate on the importance of greater transparency in corporate supply chains. This paper was accepted by Gad Allon, operations management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document