A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm Without Binary Variables for Nonconvex Piecewise Linear Optimization

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet B. Keha ◽  
Ismael R. de Farias ◽  
George L. Nemhauser
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hamid Reza Erfanian ◽  
M. H. Noori Skandari ◽  
A. V. Kamyad

We present a new approach for solving nonsmooth optimization problems and a system of nonsmooth equations which is based on generalized derivative. For this purpose, we introduce the first order of generalized Taylor expansion of nonsmooth functions and replace it with smooth functions. In other words, nonsmooth function is approximated by a piecewise linear function based on generalized derivative. In the next step, we solve smooth linear optimization problem whose optimal solution is an approximate solution of main problem. Then, we apply the results for solving system of nonsmooth equations. Finally, for efficiency of our approach some numerical examples have been presented.


Author(s):  
John Alasdair Warwicker ◽  
Steffen Rebennack

The problem of fitting continuous piecewise linear (PWL) functions to discrete data has applications in pattern recognition and engineering, amongst many other fields. To find an optimal PWL function, the positioning of the breakpoints connecting adjacent linear segments must not be constrained and should be allowed to be placed freely. Although the univariate PWL fitting problem has often been approached from a global optimisation perspective, recently, two mixed-integer linear programming approaches have been presented that solve for optimal PWL functions. In this paper, we compare the two approaches: the first was presented by Rebennack and Krasko [Rebennack S, Krasko V (2020) Piecewise linear function fitting via mixed-integer linear programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(2):507–530] and the second by Kong and Maravelias [Kong L, Maravelias CT (2020) On the derivation of continuous piecewise linear approximating functions. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(3):531–546]. Both formulations are similar in that they use binary variables and logical implications modelled by big-[Formula: see text] constructs to ensure the continuity of the PWL function, yet the former model uses fewer binary variables. We present experimental results comparing the time taken to find optimal PWL functions with differing numbers of breakpoints across 10 data sets for three different objective functions. Although neither of the two formulations is superior on all data sets, the presented computational results suggest that the formulation presented by Rebennack and Krasko is faster. This might be explained by the fact that it contains fewer complicating binary variables and sparser constraints. Summary of Contribution: This paper presents a comparison of the mixed-integer linear programming models presented in two recent studies published in the INFORMS Journal on Computing. Because of the similarity of the formulations of the two models, it is not clear which one is preferable. We present a detailed comparison of the two formulations, including a series of comparative experimental results across 10 data sets that appeared across both papers. We hope that our results will allow readers to take an objective view as to which implementation they should use.


Author(s):  
Gao-Feng Yu ◽  
Deng-Feng Li ◽  
De-Cui Liang ◽  
Guang-Xu Li

Portfolio selection can be regarded as a type of multi-objective decision problem. However, traditional solution methods rarely discussed the decision maker’s nonsatisfaction and hesitation degrees with regard to multiple objectives and they require many extra binary variables, which lead to tedious computational burden. Based on the above, the aim of this paper is to develop a new and unified intuitionistic fuzzy multi-objective linear programming (IFMOLP) model for such portfolio selection problems. The nonmembership functions are constructed by the pessimistic, optimistic, and mixed approaches so as to perfect the traditional intuitionistic fizzy (IF) inequalities and IF theory. The decision maker’s hesitation degrees with regard to multiple objectives are represented by using IF inequalities, and the new IFMOLP model based on IF inequalities is proposed. The IFMOLP problems are solved by the S-shaped membership functions without extra binary variables required by the piecewise-linear method. Finally, the portfolio selection model under IF environments based on IFMOLP is established, and a real example is analyzed to demonstrate its validity and superiority. The developed unified IFMOLP model and method can not only effectively solve multi-objective decision problems with nonsatisfaction and hesitation degrees but also remarkably reduce the complexity of the nondeterministic polynomial-hard problems.


Computing ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Brunner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document