scholarly journals Judging the Data: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice Standards

2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Schmidt
1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Richard M. Siconolfi ◽  
Fred E. Freeberg ◽  
Lee V. Varden

Good laboratory practice standards (GLPs) were issued with the intended purpose of documenting the quality of laboratory research. These rules have improved laboratory operations and documentation. However, their approach emphasizes inspecting quality as a process rather than for preventing errors in the first place. Total Quality goes beyond GLPs and requires that systems be continually improved to build in quality. This latter approach builds toward elimination of rework that result when GLP inspections uncover unacceptable errors.


Author(s):  
Elena Aloisio ◽  
Felicia Stefania Falvella ◽  
Assunta Carnevale ◽  
Mauro Panteghini

Author(s):  
R. Rosilawati ◽  
A. Ruziyatul Aznieda ◽  
A. Roziah ◽  
N. Ab Hamid ◽  
C. H. Teh ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Hassler ◽  
Gérard Donzé ◽  
Peter M. Esch ◽  
Bruno Eschbach ◽  
Hansruedi Hartmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document