Root cause analysis in the NHS: time for change?

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Shyam Kumar ◽  
Roger Kline ◽  
Tracy Boylin

Root cause analyses were intended to search for system vulnerabilities rather than individual errors, using a human factors engineering approach. In practice, root cause analyses done in the NHS may generally fail to identify components where there are organisational failures, as there may be an inherent desire to protect institutional reputation. A human factors approach to root cause analysis looks at system vulnerabilities, considering the entirety of the environment in which an individual works and taking into account factors such as the physical environment and individual mental characteristics. Other human factors include group dynamics, task complexity and concurrent tasks. It is time that the growing evidence of the potential shortcomings of root cause analysis, especially as frequently applied within the NHS, is heeded. At present, rather than assisting learning it may be an impediment to patient safety. The authors propose that root cause analyses should be performed by a group of people who are not managing the service. External organisations such as the General Medical Council, Nursing and Midwifery Council, Care Quality Commission and Practitioner Performance Assessment are heavily reliant on this tool when concerns are raised. If the flaws in root cause analysis can be eliminated, drawing on the available evidence, cases such as those of Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba and Mr David Sellu might be avoided.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 238212051989427
Author(s):  
Maya Aboumrad ◽  
Julia Neily ◽  
Bradley V Watts

Background: Clinicians are key drivers for improving health care quality and safety. However, some may lack experience in quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS) methodologies, including root cause analysis (RCA). Objective: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sought to develop a simulation approach to teach clinicians from the VA’s Chief Resident in Quality and Safety program about RCA. We report the use of experiential learning to teach RCA, and clinicians’ preparedness to conduct and teach RCA post-training. We provide curriculum details and materials to be adapted for widespread use. Methods: The course was designed to meet the learning objectives through simulation. We developed course materials, including presentations, a role-playing case, and an elaborate RCA case. Learning objectives included (1) basic structure of RCA, (2) process flow diagramming, (3) collecting information for RCA, (4) cause and effect diagramming, and (5) identifying actions and outcomes. We administered a voluntary, web-based survey in November 2016 to participants (N = 114) post-training to assess their competency with RCA. Results: A total of 93 individuals completed the survey of the 114 invited to participate, culminating an 82% response rate. Nearly all respondents (99%, N = 92) reported feeling at least moderately to extremely prepared to conduct and teach RCA post-training. Most respondents reported feeling very to extremely prepared to conduct and teach RCA (77%, N = 72). Conclusions: Experiential learning involving simulations may be effective to improve clinicians’ competency in QI/PS practices, including RCA. Further research is warranted to understand how the training affects clinicians’ capacity to participate in real RCA teams post-training, as well as applicability to other disciplines and interdisciplinary teams.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Afzal Mahmood ◽  
Ismi Mufidah ◽  
Steven Scroggs ◽  
Amna Rehana Siddiqui ◽  
Hafsa Raheel ◽  
...  

Background. Despite significant reduction in maternal mortality, there are still many regions in the world that suffer from high mortality. District Kutai Kartanegara, Indonesia, is one such region where consistently high maternal mortality was observed despite high rate of delivery by skilled birth attendants. Method. Thirty maternal deaths were reviewed using verbal autopsy interviews, terminal event reporting, medical records’ review, and Death Audit Committee reports, using a comprehensive root-cause analysis framework including Risk Identification, Signal Services, Emergency Obstetrics Care Evaluation, Quality, and 3 Delays. Findings. The root causes were found in poor quality of care, which caused hospital to be unprepared to manage deteriorating patients. In hospital, poor implementation of standard operating procedures was rooted in inadequate skills, lack of forward planning, ineffective communication, and unavailability of essential services. In primary care, root causes included inadequate risk management, referrals to facilities where needed services are not available, and lack of coordination between primary healthcare and hospitals. Conclusion. There is an urgent need for a shift in focus to quality of care through knowledge, skills, and support for consistent application of protocols, making essential services available, effective risk assessment and management, and facilitating timely referrals to facilities that are adequately equipped.


1989 ◽  
Vol 33 (15) ◽  
pp. 1024-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Armstrong

The Savannah River Site (SRS), located in South Carolina, is a key Department of Energy production and research facility for nuclear materials. Incident investigations performed at the Savannah River Site showed the cause of approximately 75% of all operating incidents in non-reactor facilities to be human error. The technical incident reporting system in place required the investigator to list the cause of an incident in broad terms (i.e., Personnel Error, Equipment Error) and to categorize it according to subclassifications (i.e., Operator Error, Supervisor Error, Mechanic Error). The reporting system, using these classifications, tended to emphasize “what happened” during an incident and “who was involved”, instead of getting to the details of “why” an incident occurred. The high rate of human error as the cause of incidents indicated that further analysis was in order. Human factors personnel in the Facility Safety Evaluation Section (FSES - an oversight organization with emphasis on non-reactor facilities) wanted to determine the causes of human error in a way that would identify more precisely why the errors occurred. To satisfy these needs, FSES is implementing a root cause analysis program for SRS. Root cause analysis consists of two parts; the first being Events and Causal Factor (E&CF) Charting; and the second, Root Cause Coding using a Root Cause Tree. The objectives were to provide a systematic method for identifying the root causes of a given incident in order to make detailed recommendations for preventing its recurrence, and to provide a database of incident root causes for identifying problem areas across incidents. Root cause analysis would guide the incident investigator to state “why” an incident occurred using detailed cause codes (e.g., Incomplete Training, Labels Less Than Adequate). Root cause trending would enable FSES to track the causes of human error, recommend solutions, and track corrective actions. FSES developed a one day workshop to train several hundred incident investigators at SRS to perform investigations using the root cause analysis method. This presentation will discuss the development and implementation of the root cause analysis system at SRS by FSES human factors professionals.


2011 ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
R. Kilian ◽  
J. Beck ◽  
H. Lang ◽  
V. Schneider ◽  
T. Schönherr ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document