Incorporating palliative care into heart failure management: a new model of care

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane I Segal ◽  
Debbie O’Hanlon ◽  
Naila Rahman ◽  
Debbie J McCarthy ◽  
J Simon R Gibbs
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Seow Lin Goh ◽  
Xuan Rui Koh Audrey ◽  
Patricia Soek Hui Neo ◽  
Grace Meijuan Yang

85 Background: Traditionally, palliative care in most hospitals is delivered through consult-based services i.e relying on the primary physician to initiate a referral to a palliative care specialist. Supportive and Palliative Care Review Kit (SPARK) is a newly developed integrated model of care that involves a Palliative Consultant and an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) co-rounding with the oncologist to provide bedside palliative care advice alongside the oncology team. Methods: To evaluate the effect of this new model on staff outcomes of teamwork and job satisfaction, a survey was conducted in March 2018 before the new SPARK model was started and 1 year later in March 2019. The survey was adapted from the Primary Care Team Dynamics Survey and Physician Worklife Survey, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. Categorical variables were analysed using chi-square test and continuous variables were analysed using student’s t-test. Results: Before the new SPARK model was started in March 2018, email invitations were sent to 89 oncology and palliative care physicians. Fifty five complete responses was received (61.8% response rate). A year after the new SPARK model was started, email invitations were sent to 23 oncology and palliative care physicians who had experienced the new model of care, of which 8 complete responses were returned (34% response rate). There was no significant differences in demographics between the two time points and in the total and domain scores between before and after SPARK. In the ‘personal time’ domain of the physician worklife survey, scores were better after SPARK (73.8± 6.68) compared to before SPARK (68.4 ± 8.70). This may be due to increased independence experienced by the APN co-rounding with the oncology team. The flexibility in team-rounding creates more personal time allowing the APN to be involved in other non-clinical tasks. Conclusions: While there were no statistically significant differences in the overall work experience, team dynamics and job satisfaction one year after the SPARK model, this may be due to small sample size.


2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-201
Author(s):  
Parag Bharadwaj ◽  
Helen Ansari ◽  
Arvind Shinde ◽  
Ernst Schwarz

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yih-Kai Chan ◽  
Alice M David ◽  
Caitlyn Mainland ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
Simon Stewart ◽  
...  

We report on our learning from many years of research testing the value of nurse-led, multidisciplinary, home-based management of heart failure. We discuss and highlight the key challenges we have experienced in testing this model of care relative to alternatives and evolving patient population. Accordingly, we propose a pragmatic approach to adapt current models of care to meet the needs of increasingly complex (and costly) patients with multimorbidity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien Spelten ◽  
Jenny Timmis ◽  
Simone Heald ◽  
Saskia F. A. Duijts

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document