The practicalities of blood pressure measurement in children

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Eileen Brennan

The accurate measurement of children's blood pressure is essential to guide the diagnosis and management of hypertension and other blood pressure-related risks. However, the traditional methods of measurement using a sphygmomanometer and stethoscope have largely been superseded by the use of electronic monitor; however, their use in the diagnosis of hypertension in children is not recommended for children

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoni Sisó-Almirall ◽  
Belchin Kostov ◽  
Esther Blat ◽  
Noemí García ◽  
Berta de Andres ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
KC Tran ◽  
J Potts ◽  
J Robertson ◽  
K Ly ◽  
N Dayan ◽  
...  

Background Multiple hypertension guidelines recommend out-of-office measurements for the diagnosis of hypertension in non-pregnant adults, whereas pregnancy guidelines recommend in-office blood pressure measurements. The objective of our study was to determine how Canadian Obstetric Medicine and Maternal Fetal Medicine specialists measure blood pressure in pregnancy. Methods An email survey was sent to 69 Canadian Obstetric Medicine and Maternal Fetal Medicine specialists in academic centers across Canada to explore the practice patterns of blood pressure measurement in pregnant women. Results The response rate was 48%. The majority of respondents (63.6%) preferred office blood pressure measurement for diagnosing hypertension, but relied on home blood pressure readings for ongoing monitoring and management of hypertension during pregnancy (59.4%). The preferred method of out-of-office blood pressure measurement was home monitoring; 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was not used due to limited availability and cost. Conclusions There is wide practice variation in methods of measuring blood pressure among Canadian specialists managing hypertension in pregnancy.


2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 549-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
D S Møller ◽  
A Dideriksen ◽  
S Sørensen ◽  
L D Madsen ◽  
E B Pedersen

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deuk-Young Nah ◽  
Jin-Wook Chung ◽  
Jun-Ho Bae ◽  
Dong-Seok Lee ◽  
Moo-Yong Rhee

Introduction: The major hypertension guidelines suggest methods for diagnosing hypertension by measuring the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) or home blood pressure (HBP) if hypertension is suspected. Hypothesis: there is no consensus of cut off values for HBP as the criterion for hypertension and also optimal duration of home blood pressure measurement (HBPM). Methods: 319 suspected hypertension patients (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, average value of three times measurements of blood pressure in the office) were included in four university hospital. The blood pressure (BP) measurement taken by patients in his/her home with HBPM device (Watch BP Home, Microlife, Swiss) and measured three times with one minute interval at morning and evening for 7 days. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) was performed by Mobil-O-Graph (IEM. GmbH, Germany). The device was set to obtain BP readings at 30-minute intervals during the day and night. The definition of hypertension was as follows, SBP ≥135 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg for HBPM and SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg for ABPM. For the analysis for diagnostic accuracy of HBPM, we used ABPM as a reference standard for the diagnosis of hypertension. Results: We decided to exclude 53 patients due to dropout or lack of valid BP measurement (valid leadings <70% of tried measurements of ABPM and less than 5-days HBPM). Finally we analyzed BP measurement data of 266 patients. Dropout or invalid BP measurement was more common in ABPM than HBPM. HBP was measured at least 6 days in more than 90% patients and white coat hypertension was diagnosed more frequently in the HBPM. HBPM had a more than 98.6% positive predictive value and 46.8% negative predictive value for the diagnosis of hypertension when put the criteria on ABPM. There are no difference of diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of hypertension according to the 5-day, 6-day and 7-day HBPM. Conclusions: A 5-day HBPM is enough for the diagnosis of hypertension considering ABPM as a reference. The cut off value of hypertension in HBPM is same to the current guideline values (135/85 mmHg) in this study. HBPM is an effective and available method for the diagnosis of hypertension in suspected hypertensive patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document