Abstract 10357: The Usefulness of Home Blood Pressure Measurement in the Diagnosis of Hypertension: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deuk-Young Nah ◽  
Jin-Wook Chung ◽  
Jun-Ho Bae ◽  
Dong-Seok Lee ◽  
Moo-Yong Rhee

Introduction: The major hypertension guidelines suggest methods for diagnosing hypertension by measuring the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) or home blood pressure (HBP) if hypertension is suspected. Hypothesis: there is no consensus of cut off values for HBP as the criterion for hypertension and also optimal duration of home blood pressure measurement (HBPM). Methods: 319 suspected hypertension patients (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, average value of three times measurements of blood pressure in the office) were included in four university hospital. The blood pressure (BP) measurement taken by patients in his/her home with HBPM device (Watch BP Home, Microlife, Swiss) and measured three times with one minute interval at morning and evening for 7 days. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) was performed by Mobil-O-Graph (IEM. GmbH, Germany). The device was set to obtain BP readings at 30-minute intervals during the day and night. The definition of hypertension was as follows, SBP ≥135 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg for HBPM and SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg for ABPM. For the analysis for diagnostic accuracy of HBPM, we used ABPM as a reference standard for the diagnosis of hypertension. Results: We decided to exclude 53 patients due to dropout or lack of valid BP measurement (valid leadings <70% of tried measurements of ABPM and less than 5-days HBPM). Finally we analyzed BP measurement data of 266 patients. Dropout or invalid BP measurement was more common in ABPM than HBPM. HBP was measured at least 6 days in more than 90% patients and white coat hypertension was diagnosed more frequently in the HBPM. HBPM had a more than 98.6% positive predictive value and 46.8% negative predictive value for the diagnosis of hypertension when put the criteria on ABPM. There are no difference of diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of hypertension according to the 5-day, 6-day and 7-day HBPM. Conclusions: A 5-day HBPM is enough for the diagnosis of hypertension considering ABPM as a reference. The cut off value of hypertension in HBPM is same to the current guideline values (135/85 mmHg) in this study. HBPM is an effective and available method for the diagnosis of hypertension in suspected hypertensive patients.

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 549-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
D S Møller ◽  
A Dideriksen ◽  
S Sørensen ◽  
L D Madsen ◽  
E B Pedersen

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Sakuma ◽  
Yutaka Imai ◽  
Ichiro Tsuji ◽  
Kenichi Nagai ◽  
Takayoshi Ohkubo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 637-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rianne AA de Heus ◽  
Maxime V Tumelaire ◽  
Marcel GM Olde Rikkert ◽  
Jurgen AHR Claassen

Background: Hypertension and cognitive impairment often coexist in older people. Office blood pressure measurement is a poor indicator for diagnosing hypertension in the general population. However, its diagnostic accuracy has not been substantially studied in patients with cognitive impairment. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of misdiagnosis of hypertension in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia compared to no cognitive impairment, by comparing office blood pressure measurement with home blood pressure measurement. Methods: A cross-sectional study including consecutive patients visiting a memory clinic between 2014 and 2017. Home blood pressure was measured for one week according to the European guidelines. Office blood pressure was assessed during routine clinical practice. Using guideline definitions for normal blood pressure and hypertension, we investigated the proportion of disagreement between office blood pressure measurement and home blood pressure measurement. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression compared disagreement in diagnosis between patients with dementia, mild cognitive impairment and no cognitive impairment. Results: Of 213 patients (aged 73.4±9.0 years, 42% women) 82 had dementia, 65 had mild cognitive impairment and 66 had no cognitive impairment. Mean office blood pressure was 156/84±23/11 mmHg and mean home blood pressure was 139/79±16/10 mmHg. In 31% of patients, there was disagreement in hypertension diagnosis. This proportion was higher for mild cognitive impairment (38.5%) and dementia (35.4%) compared to no cognitive impairment (18.2%), with adjusted odds ratios of 3.7 (95% confidence interval 1.5–9.0), P=0.005 for mild cognitive impairment and 3.4 (1.3–8.6), P=0.011 for dementia. Conclusions: In memory clinic patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment, the diagnostic accuracy of office blood pressure measurement is lower compared to patients without cognitive impairment. To avoid the risk of making improper treatment decisions in this vulnerable group, a diagnosis of hypertension should be based on home blood pressure measurement, not office blood pressure measurement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document