OS7-3 BRAIN INJURY CRITERIA EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF AXONS STRAINS(OS7: Injury Biomechanics I)

Author(s):  
Debasis Sahoo ◽  
Caroline Deck ◽  
Remy Willinger
Author(s):  
Chimba Mkandawire ◽  
Eric S. Winkel ◽  
Nicholas A. White ◽  
Edward Schatz

Operators of personal watercraft (PWC) can perform maneuvers that may result in riders separating from the moving watercraft; the tested hypothesis was whether substantial brain injury concurrent with substantial facial and skull fractures can occur from contact with the PWC during a fall. The present study reports the potential for AIS2+ facial/skull fractures and AIS2+ traumatic brain injury (TBI) during a generic fall from the PWC in the absence of wave-jumping or other aggressive maneuvers. While it is well known that PWC can be used for wave-jumping which can result in more severe impacts, such impacts are beyond the scope of the present study because of the wide variability in occupant and PWC kinematics and possible impact velocities and orientations. Passenger separation and fall kinematics from both seated and standing positions were analyzed to estimate head impact velocities and possible impact locations on the PWC. A special purpose headform, known as the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre Safety (FOCUS) device was used to evaluate the potential for facial fractures, skull fractures and TBI. Impacts between the FOCUS headform and the PWC were performed at velocities of 8, 10, and 12 miles per hour at 5 locations near the stern of a PWC. This study reports impact forces for various facial areas, linear and angular head accelerations, and Head Injury Criteria (HIC). The risk for facial fracture and TBI are reported herein. The results of this study indicate that concurrent AIS2 facial fractures, AIS2+ skull fractures, and AIS2+ TBI do not occur during a simple fall from a PWC.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik G. Takhounts ◽  
Matthew J. Craig ◽  
Kevin Moorhouse ◽  
Joe McFadden ◽  
Vikas Hasija
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Máté Hazay ◽  
Imre Bojtár

Purpose: Among the proposed brain injury metrics, Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) is a promising tool for performing safety assessment of vehicles in the future. In this paper, the available risk curves of BrIC were re-evaluated with the use of reliability analysis and new risk curves were constructed for different injury types based on literature data of tissue-level tolerances. Moreover, the comparison of different injury metrics and their corresponding risk curves were performed. Methods: Tissue-level uncertainties of the effect and resistance were considered by random variables. The variability of the tissue-level predictors was quantified by the finite element reconstruction of 100 frontal crash tests which were performed in Simulated Injury Monitor environment. The applied tests were scaled to given BrIC magnitudes and the injury probabilities were calculated by Monte Carlo simulations. New risk curves were fitted to the observed results using Weibull and Lognormal distribution functions. Results: The available risk curves of diffuse axonal injury (DAI) could be slightly improved, and combined AIS 4+ risk curves were obtained by considering subdural hematoma and contusion as well. The performance of several injury metrics and their risk curves were evaluated based on the observed correlations with the tissue-level predictors. Conclusions: The cumulative strain damage measure and the BrIC provide the highest correlation (R2 = 0.61) and the most reliable risk curve for the evaluation of DAI. Although the observed correlation is smaller for other injury types, the BrIC and the associated reliability analysis-based risk curves seem to provide the best available method for estimating the brain injury risk for frontal crash tests.


2002 ◽  
pp. 277-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Melvin ◽  
James W. Lighthall

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-196
Author(s):  
Caroline Deck ◽  
Rémy Willinger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document