scholarly journals Effect of Bond Thickness on the Fracture Toughness and the Strain Field around a Crack Tip in Adhesive Joints Using Epoxy Resin Modified with Solid Rubber Particles

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (759) ◽  
pp. 1516-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro UEDA ◽  
Nobuyuki SHISHIDO ◽  
Toru IKEDA ◽  
Noriyuki MIYAZAKI
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (0) ◽  
pp. 552-553
Author(s):  
Masahiro UEDA ◽  
Nobuyuki SHISHIDO ◽  
Toru IKEDA ◽  
Noriyuki MIYAZAKI

2000 ◽  
Vol 2000.13 (0) ◽  
pp. 349-350
Author(s):  
Daisuke IKEMOTO ◽  
Deok bo LEE ◽  
Toru IKEDA ◽  
Noriyuki MIYAZAKI

2002 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deok-Bo Lee ◽  
Toru Ikeda ◽  
Noriyuki Miyazaki ◽  
Nak-Sam Choi

The fracture behavior of an interface crack tip has significant influence on the structural integrity of an adhesive joint. We investigate a damage zone and the deformation of rubber particles around a tip of an interface crack between rubber-modified epoxy resin and aluminum. They are compared with those around a crack tip in homogeneous rubber-modified epoxy resin. Cavitations in rubber particles are observed around a damaged crack tip in homogeneous resin but not around a damaged interface crack tip. Rubber particles around an interface crack tip are deformed ellipsoidally due to the residual stress even before being damaged, and interfaces between rubber particles and epoxy resin around an interface crack tip are debonded after being damaged.


2002 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 1363-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deok-Bo Lee ◽  
Toru Ikeda ◽  
Noriyuki Miyazaki ◽  
Nak-Sam Choi

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deok-Bo Lee ◽  
Toru Ikeda ◽  
Noriyuki Miyazaki ◽  
Nak-Sam Choi

The effect of bond thickness on the fracture toughness of adhesive joints was investigated from a microstructural perspective, using compact tension (CT) adhesive-joint specimens with different bond thicknesses. The adhesive material was a rubber-modified epoxy resin with 12.5 wt% carboxy-terminated butadiene acrylonitrile (CTBN) elastomer. The shapes of the rubber particles dispersed in adhesive layers of damaged and undamaged specimens were observed with an optical microscope. The damage was distributed along the interfaces between the adhesive layer and the two adherends. The results show that the primary causes of variations in the fracture toughness of an adhesive joint with the bond thickness are not only a damage zone around a crack tip but also the combination of a damage zone around a crack tip and additional damage zones along the interfaces.


Author(s):  
David W. Beardsmore

When crack tip constraint is high, the crack tip contour integral J characterises the asymptotic stress, strain and displacement fields of a stationary crack in an elastic-plastic material. In other cases, the crack tip fields can be related to J and a second parameter Q which governs the crack tip constraint. These observations are the basis of J-Q fracture mechanics assessments. In the most usual procedure J is compared to an effective, constraint-corrected fracture toughness Jc which is derived from Q and the fracture toughness of the material. The difference Jc – J is a measure of the margin of safety. The assessment procedure assumes there are no initial inelastic strains in the component or the fracture toughness specimen prior to introducing the crack and subsequent loading. However, plant components may contain inelastic strains prior to cracking arising from welding and other manufacturing or fit-up processes. This initial strain field can be established by a finite element analysis that simulates the welding and/or manufacture sequence. Weld residual stresses develop due to the accumulation of incompatible, inelastic strains, including thermal, plastic and transformation strains in the material. If a crack is inserted into an initial strain field, a procedure is required to calculate J by analysis of the resulting crack tip fields. Moreover, for the fracture assessment method to remain valid, it must be demonstrated that the values of J and Q continue to govern the onset of crack extension or fracture so that a meaningful comparison of J with Jc can be made. This paper describes a domain integral for calculating J when inelastic strains exist prior to cracking, and its implementation in the JEDI computer code. The code is used to determine J for a crack inserted into a three-point bend specimen containing an initial inelastic strain field representative of one that might develop during welding. The extent to which the crack tip stress field is characterised by J and Q is examined by comparing it to the field for high constraint, small-scale yielding conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document