Over-the-top or tunnel reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament? A prospective randomised study of 54 patients

1994 ◽  
Vol 76-B (1) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Jonsson ◽  
LG Elmqvist ◽  
J Karrholm ◽  
Y Tegner
Joints ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Zanovello ◽  
Federica Rosso ◽  
Alessandro Bistolfi ◽  
Roberto Rossi ◽  
Filippo Castoldi

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the “over the top” (OTT) nonanatomical technique for revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 31.9 ± 11.2 years underwent revision of ACL reconstruction using OTT technique. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, Tegner score, Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sport (SPORTS) score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale, and KT-1000 evaluation were recorded at a mean follow-up of 30.7 ± 18.9 months. Results Postoperatively, the IKDC objective total score significantly improved (p = 0.0046). The KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner scores also improved, but the results were not statistically significant (62.4 vs. 72.6, 6.5 vs. 75.8, and 4.1 vs. 6.0, respectively). The subjective IKDC evaluation score improved from an average of 51.1 points to 63.7 points at the last follow-up (p = 0.0027). The RTP prevalence was 81.8%, with 44.4% of the patients returning to the same preinjury level. According to the SPORTS score, 16.6% of patients played sport without limitations in activity and performance. The average ACL-RSI score was 52.1 ± 27.0. No major complications were reported. A total of 21.5% of patients underwent surgical removal of staples. The failure prevalence was 14.3% and the cumulative survivorship, calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, was equal to 70% at 60 months of follow-up. Conclusion The OTT technique in the revision ACL reconstruction provided improvement in objective and subjective scores, good RTP prevalence, and acceptable rate of complication and failure. One of the advantages was the possibility to avoid the femoral tunnel. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.


2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Andrish ◽  
M. L. Olmstead ◽  
Helen Kambic ◽  
A. Shah ◽  
M. P. Palmisano

SummaryTo measure the change of length patterns of nine different simulated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in the canine and human knee.Six fresh-frozen canine cadaver knees and six fresh-frozen human cadaver knees were used in this study. All of the soft tissues were removed from each cadaver knee, leaving the menisci, collateral ligaments and cruciate ligaments intact. After fixation of the femur to a custom-made frame, the ACL was excised. Three tunnels were made each at the ACL origin and insertion, making possible nine reconstruction combinations. A modified intra-articular technique was used to measure change of length, in mm, of each ACL reconstruction through a range of motion of 0 degrees (full extension) to 135 degrees of flexion. A rankorder list of reconstruction combinations was determined. The most isometric combination was determined for the canine and human knees, and trends in length patterns were also evaluated in both species relative to femoral and tibial position. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA.A combination joining a point caudal to the ACL origin (over-the-top) and anterior on the tibial insertion was found to be the most isometric combination in both the canine and human. The trends in change of length patterns across all reconstruction combinations were similar in the dog and man. Isometry was improved as the reconstruction was placed further posterior on the femur and anterior on the tibia. Conclusions: The canine knee is an appropriate animal model for the study of isometry of the human ACL and its reconstructions.The length patterns of nine simulated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstructions were determined in the dog and man. In both species, the most isometric reconstruction was one joining points corresponding to a position at the posterior edge of the intercondylar roof of the femur (over-thetop) with a position anterior on the ACL insertion. For the sake of clarity the term anterior cruciate ligament has been used, throughout, for both species, instead of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) in the dog. Also knee has been used in place of stifle for the dog.


The Knee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 226-233
Author(s):  
Alberto Grassi ◽  
Nicola Pizza ◽  
Luca Macchiarola ◽  
Gian Andrea Lucidi ◽  
Federico Stefanelli ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 781-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Behr ◽  
Hollis G. Potter ◽  
George A. Paletta

We defined the anatomic relationship of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral origin to the distal femoral physis in the skeletally immature knee with use of 12 fresh-frozen human fetal specimens (ages, 20 to 36 weeks). Each specimen underwent magnetic resonance imaging, was dissected free of soft tissue, sectioned in the sagittal plane, and stained. The spatial relationship of 1) the epiphyseal side of the physeal proliferative zone to the nearest point of bony attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament and 2) the origin of the anterior cruciate ligament to the over-the-top position were measured. The same measurements were made in 13 skeletally immature knees (ages, 5 to 15 years). We found that the femoral origin of the fetal anterior cruciate ligament developed as a confluence of ligament fibers with periosteum at 20 weeks, vascular invasion into the epiphysis at 24 weeks, and establishment of a secure epiphyseal attachment by 36 weeks. In the fetus, the distance from the anterior cruciate ligament femoral origin to the epiphysis was 2.66 ± 0.18 mm (range, 2.34 to 2.94). There was no significant change in this distance in adolescent specimens (2.92 ± 0.68 mm; range, 2.24 to 3.62). The over-the-top position was at the level of the distal femoral physis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e731-e737
Author(s):  
Alejandro Espejo-Baena ◽  
Alejandro Espejo-Reina ◽  
María Josefa Espejo-Reina ◽  
Jaime Dalla Rosa-Nogales ◽  
Joaquina Ruiz-Del Pino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document