scholarly journals Splenectomy results from an 18-year single centre experience

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
ILl Davies ◽  
J Cho ◽  
MH Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Emergency Procedure ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Operative Morbidity ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
Traumatic Splenic Rupture

Introduction Splenectomy is performed both as an emergency procedure following trauma and electively when indicated for haematological disease. Postsplenectomy patients receive immunotherapy vaccines and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Despite well documented concerns regarding complications and overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI) risk, there appears to be only a small amount of consistent data on long-term outcomes. The authors therefore present their postsplenectomy patient outcomes over an 18-year follow-up period. Methods One hundred and five postsplenectomy patients operated on between 1991 and 2011 were identified from pathology codes and their case notes were reviewed. Eighty-eight patients (83.8%) were followed up for at least five years or until death. Results Of the 105 splenectomy patients (58 were male), the median age was 54 years (range: 10–87 years) and the median survival was 80 months. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 21.0% (n=22) and 8.6% (n=9) respectively. Thirty-seven patients (27 males) underwent an emergency splenectomy with a median age, operative morbidity and operative mortality of 51 years, 13.5% and 21.6% (n=8) respectively. This compares with 68 patients (35 males) undergoing an elective splenectomy with the same parameters respectively of 55 years, 25.0% and 1.5% (n=1). Excluding operative deaths, multivariate analysis revealed age (p=0.002) as the only significant and independent prognostic indicator. Immunotherapy and antibiotic prophylaxis rates for the emergency cohort were 92.6% and 88.9% respectively, compared with 90.2% and 93.4% for the elective cohort. At follow-up, no patients were readmitted with OPSI. Conclusions Over an 18-year period and a diverse indication for splenectomy, we have identified no evidence of OPSI. However, a significant operative mortality was associated with traumatic splenic rupture.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure in adults with severe aortic stenosis: single-centre experience with 20 years of follow-up†

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kalfa ◽  
Siamak Mohammadi ◽  
Dimitri Kalavrouziotis ◽  
Mounir Kharroubi ◽  
Daniel Doyle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ross Procedure ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Single Centre Experience

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of brainstem arteriovenous malformations after different management modalities: a single-centre experience

2020 ◽  
pp. svn-2020-000407
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
Ruinan Li ◽  
Li Ma ◽  
Xiangyu Meng ◽  
Debin Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Management ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Rupture Risk ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Positive Effect

ObjectiveThe aims of this study are to clarify the long-term outcomes of brainstem arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) after different management modalities.MethodsThe authors retrospectively reviewed 61 brainstem AVMs in their institution between 2011 and 2017. The rupture risk was represented by annualised haemorrhagic rate. Patients were divided into five groups: conservation, microsurgery, embolisation, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and embolisation+SRS. Neurofunctional outcomes were evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Subgroup analysis was conducted between different management modalities to compare the long-term outcomes in rupture or unruptured cohorts.ResultsAll of 61 brainstem AVMs (12 unruptured and 49 ruptured) were followed up for an average of 4.5 years. The natural annualised rupture risk was 7.3%, and the natural annualised reruptured risk in the ruptured cohort was 8.9%. 13 cases were conservative managed and 48 cases underwent intervention (including 6 microsurgery, 12 embolisation, 21 SRS and 9 embolisation+SRS). In the selection of interventional indication, diffuse nidus were often suggested conservative management (p=0.004) and nidus involving the midbrain were more likely to be recommended for intervention (p=0.034). The risk of subsequent haemorrhage was significantly increased in partial occlusion compared with complete occlusion and conservative management (p<0.001, p=0.036, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, the follow-up mRS scores of different management modalities were similar whether in the rupture cohort (p=0.064) or the unruptured cohort (p=0.391), as well as the haemorrhage-free survival (p=0.145). In the adjusted Bonferroni correction analysis of the ruptured cohort, microsurgery and SRS could significantly improve the obliteration rate compared with conservation (p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively) and SRS may have positive effect on avoiding new-onset neurofunctional deficit compared with microsurgery and embolisation (p=0.003, p=0.003, respectively).ConclusionsIntervention has similar neurofunctional outcomes as conservation in these brainstem AVM cohorts. If intervention is adopted, partial obliteration should be avoided because of the high subsequent rupture risk.Trial registration numberNCT04136860.

Unassisted and multiple microcatheter coiling of distal basilar aneurysms: Outcomes and literature review

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110217
Author(s):  
Mohamed MA Zaitoun ◽  
Islam El Malky ◽  
Sebastian Winklhofer ◽  
Anton Valavanis ◽  
Gerasimos Baltsavias
Keyword(s):  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Coil Embolisation ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Operative Morbidity ◽  
Aneurysm Size ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
Retreatment Rate ◽  
Anatomical Outcome

Purpose The best treatment for distal basilar artery aneurysms is controversial. We aimed to review our single-centre experience with coil embolisation of aneurysms at this location and compare it with the surgical and endovascular literature. Methods Forty-two aneurysms in a distal basilar location in 42 consecutive patients (15 ruptured and 27 unruptured) were treated endovascularly from 2010 to 2015. Unassisted single and multiple microcatheter coil embolisation alone was used in all cases. We studied our immediate and long-term anatomical results, operative complications, and outcome. Results The immediate angiographic results showed complete occlusion in 34 (81%), a neck remnant in seven (16.6%) and a residual aneurysm in one patient (2.4%). There were two thromboembolic events (4.7%) without clinical sequelae; therefore, the operative morbidity and mortality were zero. Three patients with ruptured aneurysms (7.1%) died due to complicated vasospasm. Thirty-nine patients (93%) had clinical and MR imaging follow-up (mean 32.3 months ± 18.6, range from 12 to 66 months). There was recanalization in 30.8% with a retreatment rate of 15.3% and no new bleedings. The aneurysm size was the most important predictor of early anatomical outcome and recurrence. Conclusion Unassisted and multiple microcatheter coiling is a safe treatment for distal basilar aneurysms. Early anatomical results and recurrence depend on the aneurysm size. Morbidity and mortality are lower and recurrence rates are higher in comparison with clipping or other adjunctive endovascular techniques.

Periprocedural risk and long-term outcome of intracranial angioplasty based on a single-centre experience

VASA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-274
Author(s):  
Dagmar Krajíčková ◽  
Antonín Krajina ◽  
Miroslav Lojík ◽  
Martina Mulačová ◽  
Martin Vališ
Keyword(s):  
Death Rate ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis ◽  
Atherosclerotic Stenosis ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting ◽  
Aggressive Medical Management ◽  
Stroke Death

Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a major cause of stroke and yet there are currently no proven effective treatments for it. The SAMMPRIS trial, comparing aggressive medical management alone with aggressive medical management combined with intracranial angioplasty and stenting, was prematurely halted when an unexpectedly high rate of periprocedural events was found in the endovascular arm. The goal of our study is to report the immediate and long-term outcomes of patients with ≥ 70 % symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis treated with balloon angioplasty and stent placement in a single centre. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective review of 37 consecutive patients with 42 procedures of ballon angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (≥ 70 % stenosis) treated between 1999 and 2012. Technical success (residual stenosis ≤ 50 %), periprocedural success (no vascular complications within 72 hours), and long-term outcomes are reported. Results: Technical and periprocedural success was achieved in 90.5 % of patients. The within 72 hours periprocedural stroke/death rate was 7.1 % (4.8 % intracranial haemorrhage), and the 30-day stroke/death rate was 9.5 %. Thirty patients (81 %) had clinical follow-up at ≥ 6 months. During follow-up, 5 patients developed 6 ischemic events; 5 of them (17 %) were ipsilateral. The restenosis rate was 27 %, and the retreatment rate was 12 %. Conclusions: Our outcomes of the balloon angioplasty/stent placement for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis are better than those in the SAMMPRIS study and compare favourably with those in large registries and observational studies.

Risk scoring by CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc as predictors for long-term outcomes after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Lauritzen ◽  
H.J Vodstrup ◽  
T.D Christensen ◽  
M Onat ◽  
R Christensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Isolation Procedure ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Ablation ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Risk Scoring

Abstract Background Following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc have utility in predicting long-term outcomes. However, it is currently unknown if the same holds for patients undergoing surgical ablation. Purpose To determine whether CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc predict long-term outcomes after surgical ablation in concomitance with other cardiac surgery. Methods In this prospective, follow-up study, we included patients who underwent biatrial ablation - or pulmonary vein isolation procedure concomitantly with other cardiac surgery between 2004 and 2018. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were assessed prior to surgery and categorized in groups as 0–1, 2–4 or ≥5. Outcomes were death, AF, and AF-related death. Follow-up was ended in April 2019. Results A total of 587 patients with a mean age of 68.7±0.4 years were included. Both CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were predictors of survival p=0.005 and p&lt;0.001, respectively (Figure). For CHADS2, mean survival times were 5.9±3.7 years for scores 0–1, 5.0±3.0 years for scores 2–4 and 4.3±2.6 years for scores ≥5. For CHA2DS2-VASc mean survival times were 7.3±4.0 years for scores 0–1, 5.6±2.9 years for scores 2–4 and 4.8±2.1 years for scores ≥5. The incidence of death was 20.1% for CHADS2 0–1, 24.8% for CHADS2 2–4, and 35.3% for CHADS2 ≥5, p=0.186. The incidence of AF was 50.2% for CHADS2 0–1, 47.9% for CHADS2 2–4, and 76.5% for CHADS2 ≥5, p=0.073. The incidence of AF related death was 13.0% for CHADS2 0–1, 16.8% for CHADS2 2–4, and 35.3% for CHADS2 ≥5, p=0.031. The incidence of death was 16.8% for CHA2DS2-VASc 0–1, 26.2% for CHA2DS2-VASc 2–4, and 45.0% for CHA2DS2-VASc ≥5, p=0.001. The incidence of AF was 49.6% for CHA2DS2-VASc 0–1, 52.5% for CHA2DS2-VASc 2–4, and 72.5% for CHA2DS2-VASc ≥5, p=0.035. The incidence of AF related death was 12.2% for CHA2DS2-VASc 0–1, 16.0% for CHA2DS2-VASc 2–4, and 42.5% for CHA2DS2-VASc ≥5, p&lt;0.001. Conclusion Both CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores predict long-term outcomes after surgical ablation for AF. However, CHA2DS2-VASc was superior in predicting death, AF, and AF-related death. Survival curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document