OV16 MASSIVE COMPLEX INGUINAL HERNIA

Aim Massive complex inguinal hernias can be exceptionally difficult to repair, especially when they are associated with loss of domain (LOD). We aim to demonstrate an open preperitoneal approach to a complex massive inguinal hernia extending into the scrotum with severe LOD. Material and Methods Footage from clinic, diagnostic imaging, and all operative procedures was included. This included botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection, diagnostic laparoscopy and placement of a peritoneal catheter, outpatient pre-operative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP), and the preperitoneal hernia repair. Results A 53-year-old male construction worker with a known inguinal hernia presented with worsening groin and scrotal pain, associated with fever. CT imaging showed an abscess secondary to perforated diverticulitis within his massive inguinal hernia, as well as massive loss of domain with almost all small and large intestine within the hernia. He was treated with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage in preparation for surgery. He received pre-operative bilateral BTA injection in the oblique abdominal musculature. Subsequently, he underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and peritoneal catheter placement. He received 2 weeks of outpatient PPP. He then underwent open inguinal hernia repair with left orchiectomy and total abdominal colectomy. The hernia was repaired with a biologic mesh placed in the pre-peritoneal plane. The patient recovered very well and had no wound complications post-operatively. He has since followed up in clinic multiple times with no recurrence and excellent cosmetic results. Conclusions In this patient with a complex massive inguinal hernia and loss of domain, we demonstrate a successful open preperitoneal repair following pre-operative BTA injection and PPP.

EP.TU.809Challenges in management of acute diverticulitis within a district general hospital

Aim Incidence of perforated sigmoid diverticular disease is estimated at 3.4 to 4.5 per 100,000. Perforation may be the first manifestation of complicated diverticulitis with a range of 50% to 70%. We aim to review management of systemically unwell patients with acute diverticulitis in a district general hospital against the 2019 NICE guidelines. Methods 29 patients presenting septic with acute diverticulitis, M:F ratio 12:17, median age 55 (range 24-82), median ASA 2 (range 0-3) were retrospectively reviewed over a 6-month period. Results Mean time to antibiotics was 3.96 hours (range 0-23.11). Of the 7 with perforated diverticulitis severity classification included: Hinchey I – n = 1, 3.4%; Hinchey IIa – 5 (17.2%), and; Hinchey IIb – 1 (3.4%). Time to CT abdomen pelvis was 3.38 hours (range 0-16.4 hours). Two pericolic abscesses met NICE drainage criteria at 3.7 cm and 3.9 cm respectively. The 3.7 cm abscess was drained radiologically at 7 days post-admission and was re-admitted 6 days later requiring further radiological drainage. The patient with a 3.9 cm abscess received a Hartmann’s procedure and had multiple re-admissions requiring a hospital stay of 34 days. There was 0% mortality at 30 days. Conclusion Management of acute diverticulitis continues to present a unique challenge. For systemically unwell patients, timely administration of antibiotics within an hour of sepsis recognition is encouraged to optimise outcomes. Timely cross-sectional imaging is pivotal in disease classification and decision-making regarding acute management. Interventional drainage and surgical resection remain important therapeutic strategies for unwell patients with Hinchey grade II diverticulitis.