A reaction to the Baroness Kennedy review – by a member of the review panel

Abstract Background Although overall infection rates of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the United States (US) remain stable, as many as 2.2 million persons are still chronically infected with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)1. Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at a higher risk of HBV infection and since 2009 three states (KY, TN, WV) have reported up to a 114% increase in cases of acute HBV infection due to higher infection rates among a non-Hispanic white populations (30–39 years), and injection drug users2. Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended as primary prevention for adults who are at increased risk for HBV infection, including PWID. However, data from the National Health Interview Survey indicate that hepatitis B vaccination coverage is low among adults in the general population3, and it is likely to be lower among injection drug users. Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) is the first serological marker to appear after HBV exposure and infection; this marker is included in the recommended panel for acute hepatitis diagnosis and accurate detection is necessary for early and accurate diagnosis. Serological testing challenges exist for HBsAg due to the high degree of genetic variability which can further be exacerbated by endogenous and exogenous pressures. The immuno-dominant region may have one or more mutations described as immune escape mutations which can decrease or abrogate HBsAg binding to antibodies used in immunoassays. Although the prevalence of these mutations is not well documented in the United States, international studies have shown that up to 79% of HBV-reactivated patients (vs 3.1% of control patients; p< 0.001) carry HBsAg mutations localized in immune-active HBsAg regions4. Methods A study was conducted using a panel of 10 unique recombinant HBsAg immune escape mutants. Panel members were tested by commercially available HBsAg serological immunoassays. Results It was found that although commercially available HBsAg immunoassays are the primary diagnostic tool for HBV diagnosis, not all HBsAg immune escape mutants are detected, with some method detecting as few as 5 out of 10 of these mutant samples. Figure 1 Conclusion Improvement is needed in commercially available methods for the accurate detection of HBsAg. Disclosures Robert Gish, MD, Abbott (Consultant)AbbVie (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Access Biologicals (Consultant)Antios (Consultant)Arrowhead (Consultant)Bayer (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Bristol Myers (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Dova (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Dynavax (Consultant)Eiger (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Eisai (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Enyo (Consultant)eStudySite (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Exelixis (Consultant)Fujifilm/Wako (Consultant)Genentech (Consultant)Genlantis (Consultant)Gilead (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)GLG (Consultant)HepaTX (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)HepQuant (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Intercept (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Ionis (Consultant)Janssen (Consultant)Laboratory for Advanced Medicine (Consultant)Lilly (Consultant)Merck (Consultant)Salix (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Shionogi (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Viking (Consultant)

Download Full-text

1157. Clinical Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Fosmanogepix, a Novel First-in-class Antifungal, in Patients with Renal Insufficiency: Subset Analysis from a Phase 2 Candidemia Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1343 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S605-S605

Author(s):

Pierre Bulpa ◽

Galia Rahav ◽

Ilana Oren ◽

Mickaël Aoun ◽

George R Thompson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Renal Insufficiency ◽

Antifungal Agents ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Antifungal Treatment ◽

Successful Outcome ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background Fosmanogepix (FMGX) is a first-in-class antifungal agent, with a unique MOA targeting the fungal enzyme Gwt1, and broad-spectrum activity against yeasts and molds, including fungi resistant to other antifungal agents. Patients with candidemia often have underlying renal insufficiency or are receiving medications that affect renal function. This analysis evaluated outcomes in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. Methods This global, multicenter, open-label, non-comparative study evaluated the safety and efficacy of FMGX for first-line treatment of candidemia. Patients with a recent diagnosis of candidemia defined as positive blood culture for Candida spp within 96 hrs prior to study entry with ≤ 2 days of prior antifungal treatment were eligible, including those with renal insufficiency. Patients with neutropenia, C. krusei infection, deep-seated Candida infections or receiving hemodialysis were excluded. Subjects were treated with FMGX for up to 14 days: 1000 mg IV BID for 1 day, then 600 mg IV QD for at least 2 days, followed by either 600 mg IV QD or 700 mg PO QD. Patients requiring antifungal treatment beyond 14 days received fluconazole. The primary efficacy endpoint was outcome at end of study treatment (EOST) as determined by an independent data review committee. Successful outcome was defined as survival with clearance of Candida from blood cultures with no additional antifungal treatment. Results 14/21 (66%) subjects had some degree of renal insufficiency: 7 had mild renal insufficiency (GFR:60-89), 5 had moderate renal insufficiency (GFR:30-59), and 2 had severe renal insufficiency (GFR:15-29). 12/14 (86%) completed study treatment, and treatment was successful at EOST in 12/14 (86%) subjects. Decline in renal function was not observed at EOST. 4 had worsening of renal function during the follow-up period; none required dialysis. Renal impairment did not increase exposure of FMGX. There were no treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion FMGX demonstrated high level treatment success with no evidence of drug-related nephrotoxicity, with no dose adjustments required. These preliminary data support the continued evaluation of FMGX in patients with candidemia and renal dysfunction as an alternative to potentially nephrotoxic antifungal agents. Disclosures Pierre Bulpa, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Galia Rahav, MD, AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Mickaël Aoun, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Peter Pappas, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Bart Jan Kullberg, MD, FRCP, FIDSA, Amplyx (Advisor or Review Panel member) Sara Barbat, BSN, RN, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Pamela Wedel, BSc, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Haran T. Schlamm, MD, Amplyx (Consultant) Michael Hodges, BSc. MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Employee)

Download Full-text