scholarly journals Institutional Selectivity and Good Practices in Undergraduate Education: How Strong is the Link?

2006 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest T. Pascarella ◽  
Ty Cruce ◽  
Paul D. Umbach ◽  
Gregory C. Wolniak ◽  
George D. Kuh ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest T. Pascarella ◽  
Ty Cruce ◽  
Paul D. Umbach ◽  
Gregory C. Wolniak ◽  
George D. Kuh ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest T Pascarella ◽  
Ty M Cruce ◽  
Gregory C Wolniak ◽  
Charles F Blaich

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricia A. Seifert ◽  
Ernest T. Pascarella ◽  
Kathleen M. Goodman ◽  
Mark H. Salisbury ◽  
Charles F. Blaich

2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 480-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy E. Mark ◽  
Polly D. Boruff-Jones

The annual National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) measures undergraduate “participation in programs and activities that institutions provide for their learning and personal development.”1 Each item on the survey correlates to one of five benchmarks of “empirically confirmed ‘good practices’ in undergraduate education.”2 The NSSE is an excellent diagnostic fit with the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education because learning outcomes can be correlated with student engagement. This article presents case studies from the University of Mississippi and Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis to demonstrate how librarians can apply NSSE results for the purpose of assessment.3


1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Davis ◽  
Rhonda Jackson ◽  
Tina Smith ◽  
William Cooper

Prior studies have proven the existence of the "hearing aid effect" when photographs of Caucasian males and females wearing a body aid, a post-auricular aid (behind-the-ear), or no hearing aid were judged by lay persons and professionals. This study was performed to determine if African American and Caucasian males, judged by female members of their own race, were likely to be judged in a similar manner on the basis of appearance, personality, assertiveness, and achievement. Sixty female undergraduate education majors (30 African American; 30 Caucasian) used a semantic differential scale to rate slides of preteen African American and Caucasian males, with and without hearing aids. The results of this study showed that female African American and Caucasian judges rated males of their respective races differently. The hearing aid effect was predominant among the Caucasian judges across the dimensions of appearance, personality, assertiveness, and achievement. In contrast, the African American judges only exhibited a hearing aid effect on the appearance dimension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document