Antonin Artaud and Freud’s “Family Romance”: The Transgressive Sublime

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-32
Author(s):  
Lynn Hughey Engelbert
1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-202
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 5252 (1919) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan C. Elms
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-187
Author(s):  
Herman Westerink ◽  
Philippe Van Haute

Although Freud's ‘Family Romances’ from 1909 is hardly ever discussed at length in secondary literature, this article highlights this short essay as an important and informative text about Freud's changing perspectives on sexuality in the period in which the text was written. Given the fact that Freud, in his 1905 Three Essays, develops a radical theory of infantile sexuality as polymorphously perverse and as autoerotic pleasure, we argue that ‘Family Romances’, together with the closely related essay on infantile sexual theories (1908), paves the way for new theories of sexuality defined in terms of object relations informed by knowledge of sexual difference. ‘Family Romances’, in other words, preludes the introduction of the Oedipus complex, but also – interestingly – gives room for a Jungian view of sexuality and sexual phantasy. ‘Family Romances’ is thus a good illustration of the complex way in which Freud's theories of sexuality developed through time.


Author(s):  
Dora M. Pettinella
Keyword(s):  

Resonance ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
Allen S. Weiss

What would it mean to consider the last works of Antonin Artaud, including his major radio piece, To Have Done With the Judgment of God—written after his return to language following years of aphasia during his incarceration in the psychiatric asylum of Rodez and upon his return to Paris just before his death—as poetry? Based upon a veritable rhetoric of repulsion and abjection, effecting an obsessive resistance to readability, Artaud utilized numerous tactics to reject the reader: unmentionable blasphemy, putrid scatology, unintelligible glossolalia, hideous violence, abhorrent politics, obscene curses, unfathomable contradictions, bewildering lists, inexorable negations, disorienting syntax, unsettling non sequiturs, undefinable neologisms, uncanny repetitions. Were these writings to be inserted into the French poetic canon, they would necessitate a radical reconsideration of poetry and poetics, indeed of the French language itself, based upon the nihilistic powers of performance and performativity.


Prospects ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 293-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Douglas

On the Phil Donahue show in early December 1981, Janet Dailey, the most successful romance writer in America today, explained, in answer to a question, why actual parents are usually absent in romance fiction. The form is short, it places a premium on excitement – and parents are not “interesting.” For a moment, Ms. Dailey almost lost her largely middle-aged audience. No one present thought to remind Janet Dailey that a contemporary genre of popular “thrillers” (which, by definition, aim to excite the reader) centers on parenthood. “Thriller” authors include Ira Levin, Peter Blatty, Stephen King, Lawrence Sanders, Mary Higgins Clark, Lawrence Block, V. C. Andrews, John Saul, and hundreds of lesser-known and -talented figures. It is logical, in fact, that no one mentioned in Dailey's presence what I call “family horror.” Romances and family thrillers are widely dissimilar, yet closely connected; the proverbial opposite sides of the same coin.


1992 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Djelal Kadir

1972 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Blin ◽  
Antonin Artaud ◽  
Victoria Nes Kirby ◽  
Nancy E. Nes ◽  
Aileen Robbins
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document