Single-pulse solid-state laser with semiconductor pumping and kilohertz pulse-repetition rate of the lasing

2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
V. A. Berenberg ◽  
S. V. Doroganov ◽  
A. A. Mirzaeva ◽  
V. A. Rusov ◽  
G. E. Novikov ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (21) ◽  
pp. 4416 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Choudhary ◽  
A. A. Lagatsky ◽  
P. Kannan ◽  
W. Sibbett ◽  
C. T. A. Brown ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingxue Li ◽  
Dongyu Liu ◽  
Junjie Chi ◽  
Chun Yang ◽  
Ziqiang Zhao ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 9950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-lei Li ◽  
Jin-long Xu ◽  
Yong-zhong Wu ◽  
Jing-liang He ◽  
Xiao-peng Hao

1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.F. Andreev ◽  
E.A. Khazanov ◽  
S.V. Kuznetsov ◽  
G.A. Pasmanik ◽  
E.I. Shklovsky ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lea Kraft ◽  
Ralf Petzold ◽  
Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola ◽  
Arkadiusz Miernik

Abstract The aim of this work was to compare the fragmentation efficiency of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser (p-Tm:YAG) to that of a chopped Thulium fibre laser (TFL) and a pulsed Holmium solid-state laser (Ho:YAG). During the fragmentation process, we used a silicone mould to fixate the hemispherical stone models under water in a jar filled with room-temperature water. Each laser device registered the total energy applied to the stone model to determine fragmentation efficiency. Our study examined laser settings with single pulse energies ranging from 0.6 to 6 J and pulse frequencies ranging from 5 to 15 Hz. Similar laser settings were applied to explicitly compare the fragmentation efficiency of all three devices. We experimented with additional laser settings to see which of the three devices would perform best. The fragmentation performance of the three laser devices differed statistically significantly (p < 0.05). The average total energy required to fragment the stone model was 345.96 J for Ho:YAG, 372.43 J for p-Tm:YAG and 483.90 J for TFL. To fragment the stone models, both Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG needed similar total energy (p = 0.97). TFL’s fragmentation efficiency is significantly lower than that of Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG. Furthermore, we found the novel p-Tm:YAG’s fragmentation efficiency to closely resemble that of Ho:YAG. The fragmentation efficiency is thought to be influenced by the pulse duration. TFL’s shortest possible pulse duration was considerably longer than that of Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG, resulting in Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG exhibiting better fragmenting efficiency.


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 120001
Author(s):  
刘京徽 Liu Jinghui ◽  
田金荣 Tian Jinrong ◽  
胡梦婷 Hu Mengting ◽  
宋晏蓉 Song Yanrong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document