scholarly journals An Alternative Theoretical Approach to Escape Decision-Making: The Role of Visual Cues

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e32522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Javůrková ◽  
Arnošt Leoš Šizling ◽  
Jakub Kreisinger ◽  
Tomáš Albrecht
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr.Sc. Mihane Berisha- Namani ◽  
Mr.Sc. Albana Qehaja

Traditionally, information systems were used to support operational functions and to reduce costs by automating many of business operations. As business has become more aware of the importance of information systems, the role of information systems has changed. From its conventional function of supporting business operations, today information systems are used to reduce business risks and to ensure that correct information is made available, so managers can make better decisions. The purpose of this paper is to give an understanding how businesses are using information systems to achieve their goals. It specifically addresses more closely the impact that information systems have in improving the decision making. Althought limited this paper sets out to explore the importance of information systems in decision making and concludes that more attention should be paid to information systems usage for decision making purposes. Finally, suggestions for further research are made.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1573-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matias Calderini ◽  
Sophie Zhang ◽  
Nareg Berberian ◽  
Jean-Philippe Thivierge

The neural correlates of decision making have been extensively studied with tasks involving a choice between two alternatives that is guided by visual cues. While a large body of work argues for a role of the lateral intraparietal (LIP) region of cortex in these tasks, this role may be confounded by the interaction between LIP and other regions, including medial temporal (MT) cortex. Here, we describe a simplified linear model of decision making that is adapted to two tasks: a motion discrimination and a categorization task. We show that the distinct contribution of MT and LIP may indeed be confounded in these tasks. In particular, we argue that the motion discrimination task relies on a straightforward visuomotor mapping, which leads to redundant information between MT and LIP. The categorization task requires a more complex mapping between visual information and decision behavior, and therefore does not lead to redundancy between MT and LIP. Going further, the model predicts that noise correlations within LIP should be greater in the categorization compared to the motion discrimination task due to the presence of shared inputs from MT. The impact of these correlations on task performance is examined by analytically deriving error estimates of an optimal linear readout for shared and unique inputs. Taken together, results clarify the contribution of MT and LIP to decision making and help characterize the role of noise correlations in these regions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document