scholarly journals A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e85955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Campa ◽  
Myrto Barrdahl ◽  
Konstantinos K. Tsilidis ◽  
Gianluca Severi ◽  
W. Ryan Diver ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingmei Li ◽  
Keith Humphreys ◽  
Hatef Darabi ◽  
Gustaf Rosin ◽  
Ulf Hannelius ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 229 (2) ◽  
pp. R43-R56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen D Flach ◽  
Wilbert Zwart

The advent of genome-wide transcription factor profiling has revolutionized the field of breast cancer research. Estrogen receptor α (ERα), the major drug target in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, has been known as a key transcriptional regulator in tumor progression for over 30 years. Even though this function of ERα is heavily exploited and widely accepted as an Achilles heel for hormonal breast cancer, only since the last decade we have been able to understand how this transcription factor is functioning on a genome-wide scale. Initial ChIP-on-chip (chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with tiling array) analyses have taught us that ERα is an enhancer-associated factor binding to many thousands of sites throughout the human genome and revealed the identity of a number of directly interacting transcription factors that are essential for ERα action. More recently, with the development of massive parallel sequencing technologies and refinements thereof in sample processing, a genome-wide interrogation of ERα has become feasible and affordable with unprecedented data quality and richness. These studies have revealed numerous additional biological insights into ERα behavior in cell lines and especially in clinical specimens. Therefore, what have we actually learned during this first decade of cistromics in breast cancer and where may future developments in the field take us?


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoyu Zhang ◽  
Thomas U. Ahearn ◽  
Julie Lecarpentier ◽  
Daniel Barnes ◽  
Jonathan Beesley ◽  
...  

AbstractBreast cancer susceptibility variants frequently show heterogeneity in associations by tumor subtype. To identify novel loci, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) including 133,384 breast cancer cases and 113,789 controls, plus 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer) of European ancestry, using both standard and novel methodologies that account for underlying tumor heterogeneity by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and tumor grade. We identified 32 novel susceptibility loci (P<5.0×10-8), 15 of which showed evidence for associations with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate <0.05). Five loci showed associations (P<0.05) in opposite directions between luminal- and non-luminal subtypes. In-silico analyses showed these five loci contained cell-specific enhancers that differed between normal luminal and basal mammary cells. The genetic correlations between five intrinsic-like subtypes ranged from 0.35 to 0.80. The proportion of genome-wide chip heritability explained by all known susceptibility loci was 37.6% for triple-negative and 54.2% for luminal A-like disease. These findings provide an improved understanding of genetic predisposition to breast cancer subtypes and will inform the development of subtype-specific polygenic risk scores.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document