scholarly journals Efficacy of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Adult Patients in First Complete Remission: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0132620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dandan Li ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Honghu Zhu ◽  
Liping Dou ◽  
Daihong Liu ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4161-4161
Author(s):  
Yingjun Chang ◽  
Honghu Zhu ◽  
Lanping Xu ◽  
Hao Jiang ◽  
Daihong Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4161 Purpose: The role of HLA-haploidentical related donors (HRD) hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1) for adults with intermediate and poor risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still not clear. Patients and Methods: Totally 428 newly diagnosed AML patients between 15 and 60 years old were studied between Jan 2006 and May 2010. Among 240 patients with intermediate and poor risk cytogenetics, 191patients achieved CR1 and received chemotherapy alone or HSCT as post-remission treatment. Of these, 141 patients received chemotherapy alone (n=78) or HRD HSCT (n=63) were analyzed. Results: Up to last follow-up time of May 2011, 44 out of 141 patients died (36 died of relapse and 8 died of TRM) and 97 patients are still alive. 49 out of 141 patients experienced relapse and 84 patients are still in continuous CR1. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 4 years was 37.4%±4.4%. Overall survival(OS) and disease-free survival(DFS) at 4 year was 63.8%±5.0% and 55.5%±4.9%, respectively. The CIR of HRD HSCT group was significantly lower than chemotherapy group(12.8%±6.1% vs.57.4%±5.6%, p<0.0001). HRD HSCT improved survival achieved by chemotherapy alone significantly (DFS at 4 years, 71.8%±6.9% v 42.6%±6.1%, p<0.0001;OS at 4 years,75.7% ±7.0% v 54.6%±6.1%, p=0.0014). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed post-remission treatment choice (HRD HSCT or chemotherapy) and high WBC at diagnosis were independent risk factor affecting relapse, DFS and OS. Conclusion: HRD HSCT in CR1 is superior to chemotherapy alone for adults with intermediate and poor risk AML patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5131-5131
Author(s):  
Andree-Laure Herr ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Rosy Reiffers ◽  
Donald Bunjes ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
...  

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML of the FAB M0 subtype is rare, often associated with a complex karyotype and a poor prognosis. Results of HSCT for this AML subtype have never been reported separately from other subtypes. We did a survey of the results of 274 HSCT in adults with M0 AML in first complete remission (CR1), performed in EBMT centres since January 1990 until 2002. One hundred fifty patients were transplanted with an HLA identical donor (HLA-id), 30 with an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) and 94 received an autologous transplant (auto). The median age was 45 years (16–71), the median interval from diagnosis to HSCT was 4 months for HLA-id, 6 months for MUD and 5 months for auto HSCT. The median follow-up time (range) was 20 months (1–109), 12 (2–53) and 10 months (1–96) for HLA-id, MUD and auto-HSCT respectively. The source of stem cells was peripheral blood stem cells for 67% of cases, and bone marrow for the remaining. The majority of grafts were non-T-cell depleted. Acute GVHD (grade I–IV) occurred in 56% of HLA-id and in 64% of MUD cases. The table shows the outcomes at two years according to the type of transplant. In conclusion, outcomes after HLA identical HSCT and MUD in adult patients with AML FAB subtype M0 in CR1 are encouraging. In comparison to allogeneic transplant cases, LFS is decreased in patients receiving an autologous transplant due to a high relapse incidence, reflecting the probable role of a graft-versus-leukemia effect in this FAB subtype. Results of HSCT in AML M0 CR1 patients Outcomes HLA-id n=150 MUD n= 30 Auto n=94 LFS: leukemia free survival; OS: overall survival; RI: relapse incidence; TRM: treatment-related mortality 2y LFS 50% 45% 33% 2y OS 58% 50% 49% 2y RI 25% 40% 57% 2y TRM 24% 14% 9%


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document