AbstractIn the natural world, sex prevails, despite its costs. While much effort has been dedicated to identifying the intrinsic costs of sex (e.g. the cost of males), few studies have identified the ecological fitness consequences of sex. Furthermore, correlated biological traits that differ between sexuals and asexuals may alter these costs, or even render the typical costs of sex irrelevant. Here we use a large-scale transplant experiment of a North American wildflower to show that sex is associated with reduced lifetime fitness, despite lower herbivory. We separate the effects of sex from hybridity, finding that over-winter survival is elevated in asexuals regardless of hybridity, but herbivores target hybrid asexuals. Survival is lowest in homozygous sexual lineages, implicating inbreeding depression as a cost of sex. Our results show that the consequences of sex are shaped by complex natural environments, correlated traits, and the identity of mates, rather than sex itself.
Sex, personality and conspecific density influence natal dispersal with lifetime fitness consequences in urban and rural burrowing owls
