scholarly journals Correction: Drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula or graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e0233923
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Conventional Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon ◽  
Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula

Long-term mortality and patency after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in the hemodialysis circuit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2022 ◽  
pp. 112972982110701
Author(s):  
Yunfeng Li ◽  
Zhenwei Shi ◽  
Yunyun Zhao ◽  
Zhanjiang Cao ◽  
Zhengli Tan
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose: To compare all-cause mortality and primary patency with drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) compared with plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) in people with hemodialysis-related stenosis. Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from November 1966 to February 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the use of DCBA versus PBA for stenosis in hemodialysis circuits. Data extracted from the articles were integrated to determine all-cause mortality, target lesion primary patency (TLPP), circuit access primary patency (CAPP), 30-day adverse events, and technical success for the two approaches. We performed meta-analysis on these results using a fixed-effects model to evaluate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) where I2 < 50% in a test for heterogeneity, or a random-effect model if otherwise. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed. Results: Sixteen RCTs of 1672 individuals were included in our meta-analysis, of which 839 individuals received DCBA and 833 received PBA. The pooled outcome showed no statistical difference between DCBA and PBA in all-cause mortality at 6 months (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.72–2.32, p = 0.39, I2 = 4%), 12 months (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.68–1.53, p = 0.91, I2 = 0%), and 24 months (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.87–2.57, p = 0.15, I2 = 0%), 30-day adverse events (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.30–3.98, p = 0.90, I2 = 66%), and technical success (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.02–1.92, p = 0.16, I2 = 65%). The DCBA had significantly better outcomes versus PBA in TLPP at 6 months (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.84–3.04, p < 0.001, I2 = 44%) and 12 months (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.22–2.56, p = 0.002, I2 = 56%), and CAPP at 6 months (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.21–3.54, p = 0.008, I2 = 67%) and 12 months (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.29–2.15, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Conclusion: In hemodialysis circuit stenosis, DCBA appears to have similar safety but greater efficacy than PBA.

scholarly journals Drug‐Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Dysfunction: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenyu Liu ◽  
Matthew Wolfers ◽  
Bint‐e Zainab Awan ◽  
Issa Ali ◽  
Adrian Michael Lorenzana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Target Lesion Revascularization ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Background Both drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and conventional plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) can be implemented to treat hemodialysis dysfunction. The present study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of these 2 approaches by conducting a meta‐analysis of available randomized controlled trials. Methods and Results PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were queried from establishment to January 2021. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials including 877 and 875 patients in the DCB and PBA groups, respectively, were included in the present meta‐analysis. Target lesion primary patency, circuit patency, target lesion revascularization, and mortality were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported with 95% CIs. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plot and Egger test. Target lesion primary patency was higher among patients who underwent DCB (OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 2.13–4.03], P <0.001 at 6 months; OR, 2.47 [95% CI, 1.53–3.99], P <0.001 at 1 year). Also, the DCB group had a higher dialysis circuit patency at 6 months (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.56–3.77 [ P <0.001]) and 1 year (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.22–3.00 [ P =0.005]). Compared with the PBA group, the DCB group had lower odds of target lesion revascularization during follow‐up (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23–0.82], P =0.001 at 6 months; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.32–1.73], P =0.490 at 1 year). The OR of mortality was comparable between 2 groups at 6 months (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.42–3.33 [ P =0.760]) and 1 year (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58–1.48 [ P =0.750]). Conclusions Based on evidence from 18 randomized controlled trials, DCB angioplasty is superior to PBA in maintaining target lesion primary patency and circuit patency among patients with dialysis circuit stenosis. DCB angioplasty also reduces target lesion revascularization with a similar risk of mortality compared with PBA.

scholarly journals Angioplasty for dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas: a meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials compared paclitaxel-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Yang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Kui Cai ◽  
Yufang Chen ◽  
Congying Xia
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neointimal Hyperplasia ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Conventional Balloon Angioplasty

Abstract Background Stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) due to neointimal hyperplasia is one of the most common causes of hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction. Treating patients with dysfunctional AVF with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may potentially improve outcomes. This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of DCB angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty by pooling evidence from the most recent randomized controlled trials. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane central databases. Two independent researchers screened the article, extracted interest and evaluated included studies for risk of bias. Pooled estimation was conducted in terms of 6-month target-lesion primary patency (TLPP) and target-lesion reintervention (TLR), as well as other outcomes. Results were expressed with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 4 RCTs were identified and included in the meta-analyses, with 911 participants. There was no significant increase in rates of 6-month TLPP (OR 1.63, 95%CI 0.39–6.79, p = 0.35), or decrease in 6-month TLR (OR 0.45, 95%CI 0.17–1.19 p = 0.07) in patients who received DCB as compared to those who received conventional balloon angioplasty. Similarly, we found no difference in the 6-month access circuit primary patency and reinvention between the two groups. Conclusion There was no evidence supporting that DCB has a statistically significant higher rate of TLPP and lower rates of TLR in the treatment of dysfunctional AVF than conventional balloon angioplasty. However, DCB was non-inferior to conventional balloon angioplasty in terms of safety. Therefore, further study is needed to clarify whether DCB angioplasty can benefit hemodialysis patients with dysfunction AVF.

scholarly journals Drug-Coated Balloon for De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: A Systematic Review and Trial Sequential Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Guangping Chen ◽  
Zongzhuang Li ◽  
Fang Wei
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Coronary Artery Lesions ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Objective. To investigate the efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for de novo coronary artery lesions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Background. DCB was an effective therapy for patients with in-stent restenosis. However, the efficacy of DCB in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions is still unknown. Methods. Eligible studies were searched on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Database. Systematic review and meta-analyses of RCTs were performed comparing DCB with non-DCB devices (such as plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), bare-metal stents (BMS), or drug-eluting stents (DES)) for the treatment of de novo lesions. Trial sequential meta-analysis (TSA) was performed to assess the false positive and false negative errors. Results. A total of 2,137 patients enrolled in 12 RCTs were analyzed. Overall, no significant difference in target lesion revascularization (TLR) was found, but there were numerically lower rates after DCB treatment at 6 to 12 months follow-up (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.01; P=0.06; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.41 to 1.16). TSA showed that at least 1,000 more randomized patients are needed to conclude the effect on TLR. A subgroup analysis from high bleeding risk patients revealed that DCB treatment was associated with lower rate of TLR (RR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.78; P=0.03). The systematic review illustrated that the rate of bailout stenting was lower and decreased gradually. Conclusions. DCB treatment was associated with a trend toward lower TLR when compared with controls. For patients at bleeding risk, DCB treatment was superior to BMS in TLR.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Arteries

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Katsanos ◽  
Stavros Spiliopoulos ◽  
Ioannis Paraskevopoulos ◽  
Athanasios Diamantopoulos ◽  
Dimitris Karnabatidis
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document